It’s not all about pay: the influence of compensation committee on say-on-pay

Purpose This study examines whether the quality of a firm’s compensation committee influences shareholders’ say-on-pay support. Design/methodology/approach Focusing on a large sample of US Fortune 250 firms, we examine whether a high-quality compensation committee is associated with higher shareholder support for executive compensation. We utilize an aggregate measure of attributes for compensation committee quality that includes directors’ interdependencies, their tenure, holding a chief executive officer position, the number of seats they hold and committee size. Findings Results show that high-quality compensation committees influence shareholders’ support in their say-on-pay votes. Moreover, shareholders are less likely to dissent against excessive executive compensation in the presence of a high-quality compensation committee. Originality/value While policymakers have set the regulation to curb excessive executive pay through shareholders’ votes, this study reveals that factors other than the excess pay itself may influence shareholders’ perceptions. For instance, investors appear concerned with the compensation committee’s effectiveness when evaluating executive pay.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Managerial Finance
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmf-01-2024-0031
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

It’s not all about pay: the influence of compensation committee on say-on-pay

Michel Magnan, Karen Naaman
1 citations
International Journal of Managerial Finance
Corporate Finance and Governance
3.91
article

It’s not all about pay: the influence of compensation committee on say-on-pay

Michel Magnan, Karen Naaman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study examines whether the quality of a firm’s compensation committee influences shareholders’ say-on-pay support. Design/methodology/approach Focusing on a large sample of US Fortune 250 firms, we examine whether a high-quality compensation committee is associated with higher shareholder support for executive compensation. We utilize an aggregate measure of attributes for compensation committee quality that includes directors’ interdependencies, their tenure, holding a chief executive officer position, the number of seats they hold and committee size. Findings Results show that high-quality compensation committees influence shareholders’ support in their say-on-pay votes. Moreover, shareholders are less likely to dissent against excessive executive compensation in the presence of a high-quality compensation committee. Originality/value While policymakers have set the regulation to curb excessive executive pay through shareholders’ votes, this study reveals that factors other than the excess pay itself may influence shareholders’ perceptions. For instance, investors appear concerned with the compensation committee’s effectiveness when evaluating executive pay.

International Journal of Managerial FinanceVol. 21(4)
Concordia University (US), SUNY Plattsburgh (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Finance and Governance
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.