Latent Class Analysis of University Departments and Employment Rate Comparison in Gyeongbuk Province

Objectives This study classifies university departments nationwide using Latent Class Analysis (LCA) and examines employment rate disparities in Gyeongbuk Province to inform policies for local universities. Methods For this objectives, we collected and refined data from the 2023 academic year graduates listed in the Ministry of Education’s “University Information” disclosures (covering 14,443 departments nationwide) and employed the categorical variables for Latent Class Analysis (LCA). After comparing model fit indices (AIC, BIC, etc.) to determine the optimal number of classes, we analyzed the size and regional distribution of departments within each class to identify the unique characteristics of those located in Gyeongbuk Province. In addition, an ANOVA and post-hoc tests were performed to examine differences in employment rates across the classes, thereby offering a detailed view of how the employment outcomes of Gyeongbuk-based departments compare with those in other regions. Results Five latent groups were identified, with Gyeongbuk departments concentrated in Class 5 (national universities). Employment rates were higher in Class 1 (private universities and vocational colleges) and Class 3 (cyber universities) but lower in Class 4 (vocational colleges offering evening courses) and Class 5. Conclusions The findings highlight the need for customized employment policies, stronger local industry collaboration, and industry-academia linked curricula to improve Gyeongbuk universities' competitiveness.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2025.25.9.1071
Primary Topic
Technology and Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Latent Class Analysis of University Departments and Employment Rate Comparison in Gyeongbuk Province

Joon Seok Park, JASON KAI WEI LEE
2 links
Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Technology and Data Analysis
article

Latent Class Analysis of University Departments and Employment Rate Comparison in Gyeongbuk Province

Joon Seok Park, JASON KAI WEI LEE
article en

Abstract

Objectives This study classifies university departments nationwide using Latent Class Analysis (LCA) and examines employment rate disparities in Gyeongbuk Province to inform policies for local universities. Methods For this objectives, we collected and refined data from the 2023 academic year graduates listed in the Ministry of Education’s “University Information” disclosures (covering 14,443 departments nationwide) and employed the categorical variables for Latent Class Analysis (LCA). After comparing model fit indices (AIC, BIC, etc.) to determine the optimal number of classes, we analyzed the size and regional distribution of departments within each class to identify the unique characteristics of those located in Gyeongbuk Province. In addition, an ANOVA and post-hoc tests were performed to examine differences in employment rates across the classes, thereby offering a detailed view of how the employment outcomes of Gyeongbuk-based departments compare with those in other regions. Results Five latent groups were identified, with Gyeongbuk departments concentrated in Class 5 (national universities). Employment rates were higher in Class 1 (private universities and vocational colleges) and Class 3 (cyber universities) but lower in Class 4 (vocational colleges offering evening courses) and Class 5. Conclusions The findings highlight the need for customized employment policies, stronger local industry collaboration, and industry-academia linked curricula to improve Gyeongbuk universities' competitiveness.

Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And InstructionVol. 25(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Technology and Data Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.