Weed–crop competition under improved nutrient management reveals trade-off between yields and weed diversity in organic farming

In the pursuit of more sustainable agriculture, weeds play a dual role by threatening crop production and simultaneously contributing to farmland biodiversity. Management actions such as the use of fertilisers (fertilisation) may change weed abundance and community composition with consequences for both weed–crop competition and biodiversity. Alleviating the balance between yield and biodiversity requires a mechanistic understanding of how fertilisation impacts weed diversity and functional community composition. To investigate this, an experiment was conducted in an organic spring wheat field in Sweden, using a split-plot randomised complete block design with crossed fertilisation and weeding treatments. The experimental design took advantage of existing variation in soil conditions, resulting in different concentrations of available nitrogen in the soil supply. With increased fertilisation and soil nitrogen supply, crop yield increased, whereas weed evenness decreased. Additionally, average weed seed mass, specific leaf area and nectar production of the weed community decreased with higher soil nitrogen supply, whilst the relevance of the weed communities for biodiversity increased. Importantly, the results showed that weed-induced yield loss depended on the fertilisation rate and soil nitrogen supply. This suggested that development of sustainable weed management should not only focus on minimising weed abundance but also on identifying nutrient management regimes that minimise the trade-offs between yield, competition, and biodiversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Agriculture & Horticulture
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2025.2505896
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weed–crop competition under improved nutrient management reveals trade-off between yields and weed diversity in organic farming

Johan Ekroos, Henrik G. Smith, Romain Carrié, Göran Bergkvist et al.
5 citations
Biological Agriculture & Horticulture
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
9.51
article

Weed–crop competition under improved nutrient management reveals trade-off between yields and weed diversity in organic farming

Johan Ekroos, Henrik G. Smith, Romain Carrié, Göran Bergkvist, Melanie Karlsson, Johanna Wetterlind
article en
5 citations

Abstract

In the pursuit of more sustainable agriculture, weeds play a dual role by threatening crop production and simultaneously contributing to farmland biodiversity. Management actions such as the use of fertilisers (fertilisation) may change weed abundance and community composition with consequences for both weed–crop competition and biodiversity. Alleviating the balance between yield and biodiversity requires a mechanistic understanding of how fertilisation impacts weed diversity and functional community composition. To investigate this, an experiment was conducted in an organic spring wheat field in Sweden, using a split-plot randomised complete block design with crossed fertilisation and weeding treatments. The experimental design took advantage of existing variation in soil conditions, resulting in different concentrations of available nitrogen in the soil supply. With increased fertilisation and soil nitrogen supply, crop yield increased, whereas weed evenness decreased. Additionally, average weed seed mass, specific leaf area and nectar production of the weed community decreased with higher soil nitrogen supply, whilst the relevance of the weed communities for biodiversity increased. Importantly, the results showed that weed-induced yield loss depended on the fertilisation rate and soil nitrogen supply. This suggested that development of sustainable weed management should not only focus on minimising weed abundance but also on identifying nutrient management regimes that minimise the trade-offs between yield, competition, and biodiversity.

Biological Agriculture & HorticultureVol. 41(3)
University of Helsinki (FI), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Lund University (SE), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
9.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.