Development of the National Adult Reading Test-Türkiye (NART-TR) for practical assessment of mental capacity

<b>Objectives:</b> To develop the National Adult Reading Test-Türkiye (NART-TR), a reading-based mental capacity assessment tool tailored to the Turkish language. Its utility was evaluated through reliability and validity testing, with a focus on its accuracy in predicting IQ scores. <b>Methods:</b> The study sample comprised of 148 native Turkish-speaking participants, including 23 indivuduals with Extremely Low IQ (EL,FSIQ:50-69), 25 individuals with Borderline/Low Average IQ (BLA,FSIQ:70-89), and 100 healthy controls (HC) with Average/High Average/Superior IQ (AHS, FSIQ > 90). Each participant completed a sociodemographic form, the WAIS-R, the NART-TR. <b>Results:</b> The mean age of participants was 24.9 years (SD = 6.07), with 74(50%) females and 107(72.3%) holding a university degree. A large inverse correlation was observed between the total number of NART-TR errors and WAIS-R total (r = -0.75, <i>p</i> < 0.001), performance (r = -0.66, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and verbal subscale scores (r = -0.81, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Segmented regression analysis was used to estimate WAIS-R total, verbal, performance IQ scores based on NART-TR error counts. The ICCs between the estimated and actual WAIS-R total, verbal, and performance IQ scores were found to be high (0.965 [CI: 0.952, 0.975], 0.927[CI: 0.900, 0.947], and 0.833 [CI: 0.776, 0.876], respectively). Additionally, error scores could effectively distinguish between the three groups, with cutoff points of 12 for AHS-IQ vs. BLA-IQ and 20 for BLA-IQ vs. EL-IQ (Respectively, AUC = 0.988 and 0.942). <b>Conclusion:</b> The NART-TR demonstrated robust reliability and validity as a quick and efficient tool for estimating the WAIS-R scores, supporting its use in detailed cognitive research and as a practical tool for the assessment of intellectual functioning in clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2508478
Primary Topic
Elder Abuse and Neglect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the National Adult Reading Test-Türkiye (NART-TR) for practical assessment of mental capacity

Şakir Gıca, Mehmet Sinan Iyısoy, Yasin Hasan Balcıoğlu, Sinan Çakır et al.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Elder Abuse and Neglect
article

Development of the National Adult Reading Test-Türkiye (NART-TR) for practical assessment of mental capacity

Şakir Gıca, Mehmet Sinan Iyısoy, Yasin Hasan Balcıoğlu, Sinan Çakır, A. V. Arslan, Emine Nur Şen, Zeynep Karaman
article en

Abstract

<b>Objectives:</b> To develop the National Adult Reading Test-Türkiye (NART-TR), a reading-based mental capacity assessment tool tailored to the Turkish language. Its utility was evaluated through reliability and validity testing, with a focus on its accuracy in predicting IQ scores. <b>Methods:</b> The study sample comprised of 148 native Turkish-speaking participants, including 23 indivuduals with Extremely Low IQ (EL,FSIQ:50-69), 25 individuals with Borderline/Low Average IQ (BLA,FSIQ:70-89), and 100 healthy controls (HC) with Average/High Average/Superior IQ (AHS, FSIQ > 90). Each participant completed a sociodemographic form, the WAIS-R, the NART-TR. <b>Results:</b> The mean age of participants was 24.9 years (SD = 6.07), with 74(50%) females and 107(72.3%) holding a university degree. A large inverse correlation was observed between the total number of NART-TR errors and WAIS-R total (r = -0.75, <i>p</i> < 0.001), performance (r = -0.66, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and verbal subscale scores (r = -0.81, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Segmented regression analysis was used to estimate WAIS-R total, verbal, performance IQ scores based on NART-TR error counts. The ICCs between the estimated and actual WAIS-R total, verbal, and performance IQ scores were found to be high (0.965 [CI: 0.952, 0.975], 0.927[CI: 0.900, 0.947], and 0.833 [CI: 0.776, 0.876], respectively). Additionally, error scores could effectively distinguish between the three groups, with cutoff points of 12 for AHS-IQ vs. BLA-IQ and 20 for BLA-IQ vs. EL-IQ (Respectively, AUC = 0.988 and 0.942). <b>Conclusion:</b> The NART-TR demonstrated robust reliability and validity as a quick and efficient tool for estimating the WAIS-R scores, supporting its use in detailed cognitive research and as a practical tool for the assessment of intellectual functioning in clinical settings.

The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Bakırköy Psychiatric Hospital (TR), Necmettin Erbakan University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Elder Abuse and Neglect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.