Efficiency comparison of missing data imputation methods in predictive model creation

Missing data is a common issue in data analysis and machine learning. This article analyzes the impact of missing data imputation methods during the data preprocessing stage on the quality of forecasting models. Selected methods are listwise deletion, mean imputation, and two implementations of the multiple imputation method in Python and R languages. Selected classifiers are Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine. The performance quality of forecasting models is estimated using accuracy, precision, and recall metrics. Two datasets were used as binary classification problems with different target metrics. The highest performance was achieved when the R implementation of the multiple imputation method was combined with RF and LGBM classifiers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
System research and information technologies
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20535/srit.2308-8893.2025.1.03
Primary Topic
Face and Expression Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficiency comparison of missing data imputation methods in predictive model creation

A.A. Popov
System research and information technologies
Face and Expression Recognition
article

Efficiency comparison of missing data imputation methods in predictive model creation

A.A. Popov
article en

Abstract

Missing data is a common issue in data analysis and machine learning. This article analyzes the impact of missing data imputation methods during the data preprocessing stage on the quality of forecasting models. Selected methods are listwise deletion, mean imputation, and two implementations of the multiple imputation method in Python and R languages. Selected classifiers are Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine. The performance quality of forecasting models is estimated using accuracy, precision, and recall metrics. Two datasets were used as binary classification problems with different target metrics. The highest performance was achieved when the R implementation of the multiple imputation method was combined with RF and LGBM classifiers.

System research and information technologies(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Face and Expression Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.