Participatory Workflow Analysis of Newborn Genetic Screening (NBS) to Support Tools for Improved Follow-Up: Comparing the Use Case of Hemoglobinopathy Traits Across U.S. States

Communication of newborn screening (NBS) results often fails to provide clear explanations of NBS screen results to parents. Understanding existing NBS workflows is vital for improving NBS follow-up. We sought to describe a diverse range of state NBS programs as a starting point for designing tools to improve NBS follow-up, using the example of hemoglobinopathy traits. At a workshop of the 2023 Association of Public Health Laboratories NBS Symposium, participants filled out a survey and modeled their state workflows. Salient features were extracted and synthesized by state. A subset of models was member checked. Representatives from 19 U.S. states participated in the workflow analysis. Mail was overwhelmingly relied upon to convey the results. NBS programs differed by point of first contact with parents and degree of reliance on third parties. A participatory approach is useful for the rapid preliminary documentation of existing NBS program diversity and opportunities and challenges to improve patient education and follow-up. Future work should broaden the analysis to additional entities or individuals, particularly parents and caregivers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11020040
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Participatory Workflow Analysis of Newborn Genetic Screening (NBS) to Support Tools for Improved Follow-Up: Comparing the Use Case of Hemoglobinopathy Traits Across U.S. States

Karen Eilbeck, Amy Gaviglio, Jacob A. Ginter, Virginia Sack et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
Genomics and Rare Diseases
3.63
article

Participatory Workflow Analysis of Newborn Genetic Screening (NBS) to Support Tools for Improved Follow-Up: Comparing the Use Case of Hemoglobinopathy Traits Across U.S. States

Karen Eilbeck, Amy Gaviglio, Jacob A. Ginter, Virginia Sack, Peter Taber, Patrice K. Held, Jennifer Weaver, Jennifer Baysinger, Sierra Daniels, Natalie Diaz-Kincaid, Emily Reeves
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Communication of newborn screening (NBS) results often fails to provide clear explanations of NBS screen results to parents. Understanding existing NBS workflows is vital for improving NBS follow-up. We sought to describe a diverse range of state NBS programs as a starting point for designing tools to improve NBS follow-up, using the example of hemoglobinopathy traits. At a workshop of the 2023 Association of Public Health Laboratories NBS Symposium, participants filled out a survey and modeled their state workflows. Salient features were extracted and synthesized by state. A subset of models was member checked. Representatives from 19 U.S. states participated in the workflow analysis. Mail was overwhelmingly relied upon to convey the results. NBS programs differed by point of first contact with parents and degree of reliance on third parties. A participatory approach is useful for the rapid preliminary documentation of existing NBS program diversity and opportunities and challenges to improve patient education and follow-up. Future work should broaden the analysis to additional entities or individuals, particularly parents and caregivers.

International Journal of Neonatal ScreeningVol. 11(2)
Washington State Department of Health (US), New York State Department of Health (US), Florida Department of Children and Families (US), Wadsworth Center (US), Oregon Health Authority (US), Iowa State University (US), University of Utah (US), Humanetics Corporation (United States) (US), Indiana State Department of Health (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
3.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.