Enhancing Diagnostic and Postoperative Outcome Predictions Through Machine Learning: A Focused Analysis on Noncardiac and Cardiac Surgeries

Background: Traditional risk scoring tools have assisted to guide surgical practice for decades. Machine learning algorithms build upon this concept to allow dynamic and tailored patient information. These algorithms have been employed across most surgical specialties with multiple aims, including cost of care assessment, risk stratification, and prediction of procedural survival. Methods: Paper selection was based on three main criteria: relevance, recency, and novelty. Relevant studies were identified through a comprehensive search of major databases, including PubMed and Scopus. Results: Machine learning algorithms pose significant advantages compared to traditional risk scoring tools. Across cardiac and noncardiac specialties, multiple studies have identified machine learning algorithms as superior to control or traditional scoring tools at diagnosis. Conclusion: In this focused analysis, we have identified the potential of machine learning to aid in diagnosis, management, and prediction of postoperative outcomes. Surgeons must continue to integrate machine learning into their practice with the aim of improving both patient and surgeon‐based outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiac Surgery
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/jocs/5521566
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Diagnostic and Postoperative Outcome Predictions Through Machine Learning: A Focused Analysis on Noncardiac and Cardiac Surgeries

Aashray Gupta, Stephen Bacchi, Ammar Zaka, Brandon Stretton et al.
1 citations
Journal of Cardiac Surgery
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
1.39
article

Enhancing Diagnostic and Postoperative Outcome Predictions Through Machine Learning: A Focused Analysis on Noncardiac and Cardiac Surgeries

Aashray Gupta, Stephen Bacchi, Ammar Zaka, Brandon Stretton, Joshua G. Kovoor, A Lombardo, Yash Paul, Christopher Hannemann, Saboor Aftab
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Traditional risk scoring tools have assisted to guide surgical practice for decades. Machine learning algorithms build upon this concept to allow dynamic and tailored patient information. These algorithms have been employed across most surgical specialties with multiple aims, including cost of care assessment, risk stratification, and prediction of procedural survival. Methods: Paper selection was based on three main criteria: relevance, recency, and novelty. Relevant studies were identified through a comprehensive search of major databases, including PubMed and Scopus. Results: Machine learning algorithms pose significant advantages compared to traditional risk scoring tools. Across cardiac and noncardiac specialties, multiple studies have identified machine learning algorithms as superior to control or traditional scoring tools at diagnosis. Conclusion: In this focused analysis, we have identified the potential of machine learning to aid in diagnosis, management, and prediction of postoperative outcomes. Surgeons must continue to integrate machine learning into their practice with the aim of improving both patient and surgeon‐based outcomes.

Journal of Cardiac SurgeryVol. 2025(1)
Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU), Flinders University (AU), Royal North Shore Hospital (AU), Gold Coast Hospital (AU), Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU), Ballarat Health Services (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.