Modelling vitamin D food fortification among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia

The colonisation of Australia around 250 years ago resulted in significant disruptive changes to the lifestyle and diet of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Traditional foods high in micronutrients, including vitamin D, have been largely replaced with energy-dense foods (1) . Sun exposure—a primary source of vitamin D—may be reduced due to changes in clothing and housing structure (2) . Consequently, there is a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration < 50 nmol/L) and low vitamin D intake among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (2,3) . There is a need for a public health strategy to improve vitamin D status. Since few foods naturally contain vitamin D (e.g., fish, eggs, and meat), food fortification could be a suitable public health strategy to increase vitamin D intake without changing consumption behaviour. In Australia, besides food mandated for fortification (e.g., edible oil spreads), few foods permitted for voluntary fortification are routinely fortified. We aimed to model vitamin D food fortification scenarios among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. We used nationally representative food consumption data from the 2012–2013 National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 4,109) and analytical vitamin D food composition data (4) to model four food fortification scenarios. Scenario 1 modelled the addition of the maximum permitted amount of vitamin D to all foods permitted for fortification in Australia: i) dairy products and alternatives, ii) butter/margarine/oil spreads, iii) formulated beverages (e.g., water with added sugar, vitamins and minerals), and iv) selected ready-to-eat breakfast cereal. Scenarios 2a–c included vitamin D concentrations higher than permitted in fluid milks/alternatives (1 μg/day) and butter/margarine/oil spreads (20 μg/day). Scenario 2a: i) dairy products and alternatives, ii) butter/margarine/oil spreads, iii) formulated beverages. Scenario 2b: as per Scenario 2a plus selected ready-to-eat breakfast cereals. Scenario 2c: as per Scenario 2b plus bread (not permitted for vitamin D fortification in Australia). Vitamin D fortification of a range of staple foods could potentially increase vitamin D intake among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples by ~3–6 μg/day. Scenario 2c showed the highest potential median vitamin D intake increase from baseline of 2 μg/day to ~8 μg/day. Across all scenarios, the vitamin D intake of all participants remained below the Australian Tolerable Upper Intake Level of 80 μg/day. Our findings demonstrated that vitamin D fortification of a range of staple foods could potentially increase vitamin D intake among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia. However, the most impactful vitamin D fortification strategy (Scenario 2c) would require a revision of the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code to permit the addition of higher amounts of vitamin D than currently permitted and the inclusion of bread as a food vehicle for fortification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of The Nutrition Society
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665125000199
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling vitamin D food fortification among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia

Carrington Shepherd, Brad Farrant, Lucinda J. Black, Dale Tilbrook et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of The Nutrition Society
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
2.82
article

Modelling vitamin D food fortification among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia

Carrington Shepherd, Brad Farrant, Lucinda J. Black, Dale Tilbrook, Erin S. Dunlop, Noel Nannup, B. Neo, John Jacky, Colin Michie, Cindy Prior
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The colonisation of Australia around 250 years ago resulted in significant disruptive changes to the lifestyle and diet of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Traditional foods high in micronutrients, including vitamin D, have been largely replaced with energy-dense foods (1) . Sun exposure—a primary source of vitamin D—may be reduced due to changes in clothing and housing structure (2) . Consequently, there is a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration < 50 nmol/L) and low vitamin D intake among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (2,3) . There is a need for a public health strategy to improve vitamin D status. Since few foods naturally contain vitamin D (e.g., fish, eggs, and meat), food fortification could be a suitable public health strategy to increase vitamin D intake without changing consumption behaviour. In Australia, besides food mandated for fortification (e.g., edible oil spreads), few foods permitted for voluntary fortification are routinely fortified. We aimed to model vitamin D food fortification scenarios among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. We used nationally representative food consumption data from the 2012–2013 National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 4,109) and analytical vitamin D food composition data (4) to model four food fortification scenarios. Scenario 1 modelled the addition of the maximum permitted amount of vitamin D to all foods permitted for fortification in Australia: i) dairy products and alternatives, ii) butter/margarine/oil spreads, iii) formulated beverages (e.g., water with added sugar, vitamins and minerals), and iv) selected ready-to-eat breakfast cereal. Scenarios 2a–c included vitamin D concentrations higher than permitted in fluid milks/alternatives (1 μg/day) and butter/margarine/oil spreads (20 μg/day). Scenario 2a: i) dairy products and alternatives, ii) butter/margarine/oil spreads, iii) formulated beverages. Scenario 2b: as per Scenario 2a plus selected ready-to-eat breakfast cereals. Scenario 2c: as per Scenario 2b plus bread (not permitted for vitamin D fortification in Australia). Vitamin D fortification of a range of staple foods could potentially increase vitamin D intake among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples by ~3–6 μg/day. Scenario 2c showed the highest potential median vitamin D intake increase from baseline of 2 μg/day to ~8 μg/day. Across all scenarios, the vitamin D intake of all participants remained below the Australian Tolerable Upper Intake Level of 80 μg/day. Our findings demonstrated that vitamin D fortification of a range of staple foods could potentially increase vitamin D intake among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia. However, the most impactful vitamin D fortification strategy (Scenario 2c) would require a revision of the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code to permit the addition of higher amounts of vitamin D than currently permitted and the inclusion of bread as a food vehicle for fortification.

Proceedings of The Nutrition SocietyVol. 84(OCE1)
Deakin University (AU), The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU), Murdoch University (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Curtin University (AU), Tharawal Aboriginal (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.