Dietary intakes and nutritional adequacy of Australians consuming plant-based diets compared to a regular meat-eating diet

Despite the healthful nature of plant-based diets (PBDs) there is potential for nutrient inadequacies (1) . This study aimed to compare dietary intakes and nutritional adequacy in Australians following plant-based diets compared a regular meat-eating diet (RME) in a cross-sectional study of adults (n = 240) aged 30–75yrs. Participants were habitually consuming dietary patterns for ≥ 6 months; vegan, lacto-vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian or RME (n = 48 per group). Dietary intake was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire and dietitian-administered diet histories. Multivariable regression was used to adjust for potential lifestyle and demographic confounders. Compared to RMEs, vegans and lacto-ovo vegetarians had significantly lower dietary intakes of protein (percentage energy intake, EN%), saturated fat, trans fat, cholesterol, vitamin B 12 , iodine, riboflavin, niacin, sodium, and long chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCn-3PUFA), and higher carbohydrate (EN%), dietary fibre, vitamin E, folate, magnesium, iron, and n-6PUFA, whereas, pesco-vegetarians and semi-vegetarians had intermediate intakes. Individuals adhering to PBD consumed significantly more vegetables, fruit (vegan only), legumes/nuts, and less discretionary choices compared to RMEs. All dietary patterns met adequate intake for protein, exceeded for fat, were below for carbohydrate (EN%) and had adequate serves of fruit and vegetables, but not grains. Including plant-based alternatives, vegans, lacto-ovo vegetarians, and semi-vegetarians had inadequate serves of ‘meat/poultry/eggs/beans/nuts’, and semi-vegetarians and RMEs had inadequate serves of dairy. Vegans and lacto-vegetarians had nutritional inadequacies in vitamin B 12 , LCn-3PUFA, iodine, and in addition calcium among vegans, pesco-vegetarians in iodine, and semi-vegetarians and RMEs in LCn-3PUFA. PBDs, specifically vegans and lacto-ovo vegetarians, while significantly higher in beneficial nutrients and wholefood groups than RMEs, may lead to nutritional inadequacies if not planned appropriately.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of The Nutrition Society
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s002966512500014x
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dietary intakes and nutritional adequacy of Australians consuming plant-based diets compared to a regular meat-eating diet

J. Ferguson, G. Austin, C. Oldmeadow, M. Garg et al.
Proceedings of The Nutrition Society
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Dietary intakes and nutritional adequacy of Australians consuming plant-based diets compared to a regular meat-eating diet

J. Ferguson, G. Austin, C. Oldmeadow, M. Garg, Shaun Eslick, L. Wood
article en

Abstract

Despite the healthful nature of plant-based diets (PBDs) there is potential for nutrient inadequacies (1) . This study aimed to compare dietary intakes and nutritional adequacy in Australians following plant-based diets compared a regular meat-eating diet (RME) in a cross-sectional study of adults (n = 240) aged 30–75yrs. Participants were habitually consuming dietary patterns for ≥ 6 months; vegan, lacto-vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian or RME (n = 48 per group). Dietary intake was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire and dietitian-administered diet histories. Multivariable regression was used to adjust for potential lifestyle and demographic confounders. Compared to RMEs, vegans and lacto-ovo vegetarians had significantly lower dietary intakes of protein (percentage energy intake, EN%), saturated fat, trans fat, cholesterol, vitamin B 12 , iodine, riboflavin, niacin, sodium, and long chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCn-3PUFA), and higher carbohydrate (EN%), dietary fibre, vitamin E, folate, magnesium, iron, and n-6PUFA, whereas, pesco-vegetarians and semi-vegetarians had intermediate intakes. Individuals adhering to PBD consumed significantly more vegetables, fruit (vegan only), legumes/nuts, and less discretionary choices compared to RMEs. All dietary patterns met adequate intake for protein, exceeded for fat, were below for carbohydrate (EN%) and had adequate serves of fruit and vegetables, but not grains. Including plant-based alternatives, vegans, lacto-ovo vegetarians, and semi-vegetarians had inadequate serves of ‘meat/poultry/eggs/beans/nuts’, and semi-vegetarians and RMEs had inadequate serves of dairy. Vegans and lacto-vegetarians had nutritional inadequacies in vitamin B 12 , LCn-3PUFA, iodine, and in addition calcium among vegans, pesco-vegetarians in iodine, and semi-vegetarians and RMEs in LCn-3PUFA. PBDs, specifically vegans and lacto-ovo vegetarians, while significantly higher in beneficial nutrients and wholefood groups than RMEs, may lead to nutritional inadequacies if not planned appropriately.

Proceedings of The Nutrition SocietyVol. 84(OCE1)
Hunter Medical Research Institute (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.