Exploring nutrition misinformation on social media platforms

Social media platforms such as Instagram and TikTok have transformed how individuals seek and engage with dietary advice, leading to the rapid propagation of unverified nutrition information that can result in poor dietary choices, contribute to disordered eating and broader health issues (1) . This study aims to measure the accuracy and frequency of nutrition misinformation, identify the types of thematic misinformation, and understand user engagement metrics on Instagram and TikTok. A mixed-methods approach was employed, analysing 500 posts (250 from each platform) collected over a six-month period from September 15, 2023, to March 15, 2024, using keywords like healthy eating, healthy food, diet, and weight loss. Posts were evaluated using a modified, previously developed, Social Media Evaluation Checklist (2) and evidence coding framework to measure accuracy. Results indicated a higher prevalence of misinformation on TikTok compared to Instagram, with a significant portion (p < 0.05) of users lacking relevant credentials. The most common characteristic was cooking/recipes and meal plans. TikTok posts with mostly accurate and completely inaccurate information had higher engagement than Instagram posts. TikTok had a larger proportion of completely inaccurate posts (10.8%), mainly related to weight loss. Descriptive statistics for engagement metrics showed TikTok posts had significantly (p < 0.05) higher likes and comments compared to Instagram posts across various accuracy levels. For Instagram, completely accurate posts had a mean of 4,318 likes and 40 comments, while mostly accurate posts had a mean of 25,153 likes and 186 comments. For TikTok, completely accurate posts had a mean of 146,327 likes and 423 comments, mostly accurate posts had a mean of 75,804 likes and 483 comments. An independent t-test revealed significant (p < 0.05) differences in likes and comments between platforms for posts with varying accuracy levels. The study highlights the need for social media platforms to verify the qualifications of individuals providing nutrition advice and implement measures to promote accurate information. Further research is necessary to develop effective strategies to mitigate the spread of misinformation via social media platforms and its impact on public health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of The Nutrition Society
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665125000187
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring nutrition misinformation on social media platforms

Radhika Ranjan Roy, Jacqueline Grgurevic, Rayan Diyab
6 citations
Proceedings of The Nutrition Society
Misinformation and Its Impacts
25.21
article

Exploring nutrition misinformation on social media platforms

Radhika Ranjan Roy, Jacqueline Grgurevic, Rayan Diyab
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Social media platforms such as Instagram and TikTok have transformed how individuals seek and engage with dietary advice, leading to the rapid propagation of unverified nutrition information that can result in poor dietary choices, contribute to disordered eating and broader health issues (1) . This study aims to measure the accuracy and frequency of nutrition misinformation, identify the types of thematic misinformation, and understand user engagement metrics on Instagram and TikTok. A mixed-methods approach was employed, analysing 500 posts (250 from each platform) collected over a six-month period from September 15, 2023, to March 15, 2024, using keywords like healthy eating, healthy food, diet, and weight loss. Posts were evaluated using a modified, previously developed, Social Media Evaluation Checklist (2) and evidence coding framework to measure accuracy. Results indicated a higher prevalence of misinformation on TikTok compared to Instagram, with a significant portion (p < 0.05) of users lacking relevant credentials. The most common characteristic was cooking/recipes and meal plans. TikTok posts with mostly accurate and completely inaccurate information had higher engagement than Instagram posts. TikTok had a larger proportion of completely inaccurate posts (10.8%), mainly related to weight loss. Descriptive statistics for engagement metrics showed TikTok posts had significantly (p < 0.05) higher likes and comments compared to Instagram posts across various accuracy levels. For Instagram, completely accurate posts had a mean of 4,318 likes and 40 comments, while mostly accurate posts had a mean of 25,153 likes and 186 comments. For TikTok, completely accurate posts had a mean of 146,327 likes and 423 comments, mostly accurate posts had a mean of 75,804 likes and 483 comments. An independent t-test revealed significant (p < 0.05) differences in likes and comments between platforms for posts with varying accuracy levels. The study highlights the need for social media platforms to verify the qualifications of individuals providing nutrition advice and implement measures to promote accurate information. Further research is necessary to develop effective strategies to mitigate the spread of misinformation via social media platforms and its impact on public health.

Proceedings of The Nutrition SocietyVol. 84(OCE1)
The University of Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
25.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.