Feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of a co-designed and personalised intervention (Veg4Me) to improve vegetable intake in young adults living in rural Australian communities

Low vegetable intake is a key contributor to the health burden experienced by young adults in rural communities (1) . Digital interventions provide an accessible delivery model that can be personalised to meet the diverse preferences of young adults (2) . This study aimed to determine the feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of a personalised digital intervention to increase vegetable intake (Veg4Me), co-designed to meet the needs of young adults living in rural Australian communities (3) . A 12-week assessor-blinded, two-arm, parallel randomised controlled trial was undertaken from August 2023 until April 2024. Young adults (18–35 years; consuming < 5 serves of vegetables/day; with an internet-connected device) living in Loddon Campaspe or Colac Otway Shire in Victoria, Australia, were recruited via social media and local government networks. Participants were randomised to receive 12 weeks of personalised (intervention) or non-personalised (control) support via a free web application (app; Veg4Me). Key features included 1) recipes personalised to users’ dietary and cooking preferences, 2) geo-located food environment map, 3) healthy eating resources, 4) goal-setting portal and 5) personalised e-newsletters. The primary outcome was feasibility: recruitment, participation and retention rate. Secondary outcomes were usability and user experience, perceived changed in vegetable intake, self-reported vegetable intake, and confidence to cook fresh green and root vegetables. Regression analyses (adjusted for baseline) were used to test for significant differences between groups. A total of n = 536 individuals registered on the Veg4Me website. After excluding fraudulent and duplicate responses (n = 289), n = 124 were eligible and provided consent to participate, n = 116 were randomised and n = 83 completed postintervention data collection. The recruitment rate was 47%, participation rate was 93% and retention rate was 72%. Compared to the control, more intervention participants were satisfied with Veg4Me (76% vs 52%). Most intervention participants reported that access to personalised recipes gave them confidence to eat a wider variety of vegetables (83%), while 76% accessed the food environment map, 63% accessed the healthy eating resources, 78% accessed the goal-setting function and 90% reported that the e-newsletters prompted them to access Veg4Me. Compared to the control, more intervention participants perceived that their vegetable intake had changed in the last 12 weeks (85% vs 57%; p = 0.013). Mean vegetable intake at 12 weeks in intervention and control participants was 2.7 (SD 1.0) and 2.7 (SD 1.4) serves/day, respectively (p = 0.67). Confidence to cook fresh green vegetables at 12 weeks in intervention and control participants was 93% and 91%, respectively (p = 0.24), while for root vegetables this was 88% and 81%, respectively (p = 0.11). Findings demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of the Veg4Me intervention, and some evidence of efficacy. This study introduces a new strategy that has promise for addressing diet and health inequities experienced by young adults living in rural communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of The Nutrition Society
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665125000709
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of a co-designed and personalised intervention (Veg4Me) to improve vegetable intake in young adults living in rural Australian communities

Laura Alston, Gilly A. Hendrie, Scott Barnett, Kate Dullaghan et al.
Proceedings of The Nutrition Society
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
article

Feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of a co-designed and personalised intervention (Veg4Me) to improve vegetable intake in young adults living in rural Australian communities

Laura Alston, Gilly A. Hendrie, Scott Barnett, Kate Dullaghan, S.A. McNaughton, Lauren C. Blekkenhorst, Yixuan Zhang, Stephanie Ruth Partridge, Ralph Maddison, J.C. Mathers, Jonathan C Rawstorn, G. Abbott, Stephanie Godrich, K.M. Livingstone, Ekwere Ifiok O.
article en

Abstract

Low vegetable intake is a key contributor to the health burden experienced by young adults in rural communities (1) . Digital interventions provide an accessible delivery model that can be personalised to meet the diverse preferences of young adults (2) . This study aimed to determine the feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of a personalised digital intervention to increase vegetable intake (Veg4Me), co-designed to meet the needs of young adults living in rural Australian communities (3) . A 12-week assessor-blinded, two-arm, parallel randomised controlled trial was undertaken from August 2023 until April 2024. Young adults (18–35 years; consuming < 5 serves of vegetables/day; with an internet-connected device) living in Loddon Campaspe or Colac Otway Shire in Victoria, Australia, were recruited via social media and local government networks. Participants were randomised to receive 12 weeks of personalised (intervention) or non-personalised (control) support via a free web application (app; Veg4Me). Key features included 1) recipes personalised to users’ dietary and cooking preferences, 2) geo-located food environment map, 3) healthy eating resources, 4) goal-setting portal and 5) personalised e-newsletters. The primary outcome was feasibility: recruitment, participation and retention rate. Secondary outcomes were usability and user experience, perceived changed in vegetable intake, self-reported vegetable intake, and confidence to cook fresh green and root vegetables. Regression analyses (adjusted for baseline) were used to test for significant differences between groups. A total of n = 536 individuals registered on the Veg4Me website. After excluding fraudulent and duplicate responses (n = 289), n = 124 were eligible and provided consent to participate, n = 116 were randomised and n = 83 completed postintervention data collection. The recruitment rate was 47%, participation rate was 93% and retention rate was 72%. Compared to the control, more intervention participants were satisfied with Veg4Me (76% vs 52%). Most intervention participants reported that access to personalised recipes gave them confidence to eat a wider variety of vegetables (83%), while 76% accessed the food environment map, 63% accessed the healthy eating resources, 78% accessed the goal-setting function and 90% reported that the e-newsletters prompted them to access Veg4Me. Compared to the control, more intervention participants perceived that their vegetable intake had changed in the last 12 weeks (85% vs 57%; p = 0.013). Mean vegetable intake at 12 weeks in intervention and control participants was 2.7 (SD 1.0) and 2.7 (SD 1.4) serves/day, respectively (p = 0.67). Confidence to cook fresh green vegetables at 12 weeks in intervention and control participants was 93% and 91%, respectively (p = 0.24), while for root vegetables this was 88% and 81%, respectively (p = 0.11). Findings demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of the Veg4Me intervention, and some evidence of efficacy. This study introduces a new strategy that has promise for addressing diet and health inequities experienced by young adults living in rural communities.

Proceedings of The Nutrition SocietyVol. 84(OCE1)
Edith Cowan University (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), Deakin University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), SA Health (AU), CSIRO Health and Biosecurity (AU), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.