Restoring the commons: optimizing the restoration of natural assets

Abstract This paper analyzes the optimal restoration of natural assets, including, for example, degraded ecosystems and biodiversity, contaminated sites, and lost carbon stocks. The focus is on dynamic allocation of a fixed budget, where the decision maker chooses the timing and level of restoration investments for each stock. The decision maker is able to rely on both costly restoration investments and on natural regeneration processes in restoration planning. We characterize the properties of any optimal solution to the dynamic allocation problem, including related waiting and investment rules, and derive conditions for when it is optimal to rely on both natural restoration processes and active, but costly, restoration. We also illustrate the model by applying it to the allocation of biodiversity restoration funds in Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Theory
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-025-01649-1
Primary Topic
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restoring the commons: optimizing the restoration of natural assets

Pauli Lappi, Juha E. Jääskeläinen
Economic Theory
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
article

Restoring the commons: optimizing the restoration of natural assets

Pauli Lappi, Juha E. Jääskeläinen
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper analyzes the optimal restoration of natural assets, including, for example, degraded ecosystems and biodiversity, contaminated sites, and lost carbon stocks. The focus is on dynamic allocation of a fixed budget, where the decision maker chooses the timing and level of restoration investments for each stock. The decision maker is able to rely on both costly restoration investments and on natural regeneration processes in restoration planning. We characterize the properties of any optimal solution to the dynamic allocation problem, including related waiting and investment rules, and derive conditions for when it is optimal to rely on both natural restoration processes and active, but costly, restoration. We also illustrate the model by applying it to the allocation of biodiversity restoration funds in Europe.

Economic TheoryVol. 80(4)
University of Helsinki (FI)
Helsingin Yliopisto, Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri, European Commission, Academy of Finland, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Joint Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.