<b>A Reliable Method for Diagnosing Meniscal Tears in the Knee Using 0.3 Tesla MRI</b>

Objective: The purpose of this research is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of arthroscopic findings versus a 0.3-tesla MRI for meniscal damage in the knee. Methodology: Eighty individuals were sent from the orthopaedic clinic who met the inclusion criteria for the study. This 0.3 Tesla scan was done by just one MRI technician. A professor of orthopedics performed an arthroscopy to corroborate the MRI's findings. Using a proforma spreadsheet, we recorded and examined all of the information.00 Results Out of the total, 72 were males (or 90%) and 8 were females (or 10%). Mean age of the cases was 27.16 years. Contrary to arthroscopy, MRI was more sensitive (98%), specific (94%), and accurate (96%), when it came to identifying meniscal lesions of the knee joint. Conclusion: We found that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a safe, accurate, and noninvasive way to assess meniscal injuries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of medical & health sciences review.
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62019/zdkh8j22
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Reliable Method for Diagnosing Meniscal Tears in the Knee Using 0.3 Tesla MRI

Syed Naseer Ahmed
Journal of medical & health sciences review.
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

A Reliable Method for Diagnosing Meniscal Tears in the Knee Using 0.3 Tesla MRI

Syed Naseer Ahmed
article en

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this research is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of arthroscopic findings versus a 0.3-tesla MRI for meniscal damage in the knee. Methodology: Eighty individuals were sent from the orthopaedic clinic who met the inclusion criteria for the study. This 0.3 Tesla scan was done by just one MRI technician. A professor of orthopedics performed an arthroscopy to corroborate the MRI's findings. Using a proforma spreadsheet, we recorded and examined all of the information.00 Results Out of the total, 72 were males (or 90%) and 8 were females (or 10%). Mean age of the cases was 27.16 years. Contrary to arthroscopy, MRI was more sensitive (98%), specific (94%), and accurate (96%), when it came to identifying meniscal lesions of the knee joint. Conclusion: We found that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a safe, accurate, and noninvasive way to assess meniscal injuries.

Journal of medical & health sciences review.Vol. 2(2)
Shaikh Zayed Hospital (PK), Shaikh Khalifa Medical City (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.