THE ACCURACY OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FOR SCREENING CERVICAL CANCER MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI) IS A DEPENDABLE TOOL FOR CANCER DETECTION

Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI with that of clinical diagnosis in identifying cervical cancer in patients with cervix carcinoma. Methods: This study enrolled 90 participants, ranging in age from 30 to 65, all of whom had a clinical suspicion of cervical cancer. After getting the patient's signed consent, we took their age, address, socioeconomic situation, co-morbidities, and clinical presentation into careful consideration. In order to detect the cancer, an MRI of the pelvis was conducted on every patient. The gold standard was histopathology. Results: Included patients had mean age 48.76 years. Postmenopausal bleeding was the most common symptom, experienced by 45.6% of patients. Atypical vaginal bleeding was the second most common symptom, seen by 31.1% of patients. Fourteen patients (15.6% of the total) reported a foul-smelling, watery discharge, and seven patients (7.8%) reported pelvic discomfort. The MRI data showed a positive outcome for 72.2% of patients and a poor outcome for 27.8% of patients. Although 23 individuals (or 25.6% of the total) got negative results from histological examinations, 67 patients (74.4%) had favorable results. There was a 93.3 percent success rate for MRI diagnoses. The PPV, sensitivity, and specificity were all above average. Conclusion: We came to the conclusion in this study that magnetic resonance imaging is a useful diagnostic method for the diagnosis of cervical cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of medical & health sciences review.
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62019/fed2ka12
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE ACCURACY OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FOR SCREENING CERVICAL CANCER MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI) IS A DEPENDABLE TOOL FOR CANCER DETECTION

Syed Naseer Ahmed
Journal of medical & health sciences review.
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
article

THE ACCURACY OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FOR SCREENING CERVICAL CANCER MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI) IS A DEPENDABLE TOOL FOR CANCER DETECTION

Syed Naseer Ahmed
article en

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI with that of clinical diagnosis in identifying cervical cancer in patients with cervix carcinoma. Methods: This study enrolled 90 participants, ranging in age from 30 to 65, all of whom had a clinical suspicion of cervical cancer. After getting the patient's signed consent, we took their age, address, socioeconomic situation, co-morbidities, and clinical presentation into careful consideration. In order to detect the cancer, an MRI of the pelvis was conducted on every patient. The gold standard was histopathology. Results: Included patients had mean age 48.76 years. Postmenopausal bleeding was the most common symptom, experienced by 45.6% of patients. Atypical vaginal bleeding was the second most common symptom, seen by 31.1% of patients. Fourteen patients (15.6% of the total) reported a foul-smelling, watery discharge, and seven patients (7.8%) reported pelvic discomfort. The MRI data showed a positive outcome for 72.2% of patients and a poor outcome for 27.8% of patients. Although 23 individuals (or 25.6% of the total) got negative results from histological examinations, 67 patients (74.4%) had favorable results. There was a 93.3 percent success rate for MRI diagnoses. The PPV, sensitivity, and specificity were all above average. Conclusion: We came to the conclusion in this study that magnetic resonance imaging is a useful diagnostic method for the diagnosis of cervical cancer.

Journal of medical & health sciences review.Vol. 2(2)
Shaikh Zayed Hospital (PK), Shaikh Khalifa Medical City (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.