Microanalysis of Positive and Negative Content in Solution-Focused Brief Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Expert Sessions

The models of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) differ in their primary focus: problem solving versus solution building. These theoretical differences imply dissimilar practices, including the content of the therapeutic dialogue. Specifically, CBT sessions should include more talk about negative topics in clients' lives such as problems and situational difficulties, whereas SFBT sessions should focus on positive topics in clients' lives such as strengths and resources. We tested whether expert practice reflects these differences in the models. A reliable microanalysis revealed that demonstration sessions by three experts in each model differed significantly in the expected directions: negative content was significantly higher in CBT than SFBT sessions, and positive content was significantly higher in SFBT than CBT sessions. There was also a significant tendency for clients to respond in kind (i.e., negative therapist content was followed by negative client content, and positive therapist content by positive client content).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Systemic Therapies
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2024.43.3.50
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microanalysis of Positive and Negative Content in Solution-Focused Brief Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Expert Sessions

Sara Smock Jordan, Janet Beavin Bavelas, Adam S. Froerer
1 citations
Journal of Systemic Therapies
Educational and Psychological Assessments
0.79
article

Microanalysis of Positive and Negative Content in Solution-Focused Brief Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Expert Sessions

Sara Smock Jordan, Janet Beavin Bavelas, Adam S. Froerer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The models of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) differ in their primary focus: problem solving versus solution building. These theoretical differences imply dissimilar practices, including the content of the therapeutic dialogue. Specifically, CBT sessions should include more talk about negative topics in clients' lives such as problems and situational difficulties, whereas SFBT sessions should focus on positive topics in clients' lives such as strengths and resources. We tested whether expert practice reflects these differences in the models. A reliable microanalysis revealed that demonstration sessions by three experts in each model differed significantly in the expected directions: negative content was significantly higher in CBT than SFBT sessions, and positive content was significantly higher in SFBT than CBT sessions. There was also a significant tendency for clients to respond in kind (i.e., negative therapist content was followed by negative client content, and positive therapist content by positive client content).

Journal of Systemic TherapiesVol. 43(3)
Argosy University (US), Texas Tech University (US), University of Victoria (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
0.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.