Where Knowledge Begins? Generative Search, Information Literacy, and the Problem of Friction

Abstract This article explores the rise of generative AI and large language model (LLM) tools for internet search and their potential impact on student information seeking behavior. Reviewing what is known about best search practices, the essay identifies a schism between AI companies’ vision of search and information science's understanding of humane search environments. It argues that generative search tools fail to create ethical spaces for search, leading to dangerous territories for knowledge production. Specifically, the article discusses “friction” as a critical concept where the field of information science and AI development philosophies diverge. Whereas information science views friction as a valuable and often necessary component to search, AI companies view friction as a problem to eliminate. It is this mismatch between corporate AI philosophies and known best practices for search that, this essay argues, renders current LLM and generative AI search tools fundamentally incompatible with ethical processes of knowledge production.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Critical AI
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/2834703x-11556038
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Literacy, Media, and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where Knowledge Begins? Generative Search, Information Literacy, and the Problem of Friction

Leslie Allison, Tiffany DeRewal
2 citations
Critical AI
Literacy, Media, and Education
7.82
article

Where Knowledge Begins? Generative Search, Information Literacy, and the Problem of Friction

Leslie Allison, Tiffany DeRewal
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the rise of generative AI and large language model (LLM) tools for internet search and their potential impact on student information seeking behavior. Reviewing what is known about best search practices, the essay identifies a schism between AI companies’ vision of search and information science's understanding of humane search environments. It argues that generative search tools fail to create ethical spaces for search, leading to dangerous territories for knowledge production. Specifically, the article discusses “friction” as a critical concept where the field of information science and AI development philosophies diverge. Whereas information science views friction as a valuable and often necessary component to search, AI companies view friction as a problem to eliminate. It is this mismatch between corporate AI philosophies and known best practices for search that, this essay argues, renders current LLM and generative AI search tools fundamentally incompatible with ethical processes of knowledge production.

Critical AIVol. 2(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Literacy, Media, and Education
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.