Don't Forget That There Are People in the Data: LLMs in the Context of Human Rights

Abstract Large language models (LLMs), and generative AI generally, raise significant concerns regarding human rights. Their promise in finding insights in patterns of data have to be weighed against potential risks to individuals and societies. The typical perspective, which emphasizes accuracy, capability, or scope of such systems, overlooks the fact that generative AI technologies exploit massive collections of data about human behaviors, thoughts, and ideas. The datafication of human life should be examined through the lens of human rights, specifically with regard to autonomy, dignity, equality, and community. This piece argues that discussions about LLMs and generative AI are inherently linked to data originated from individuals, whose information are embedded in the training data. Data are human rights issues because information about individuals are buried in the data. Technical solutions alone are insufficient to address the human rights distortions produced by LLMs. Policy should focus instead on the fact that data are collected on rights-bearing individuals and groups who have been given very little leeway to discuss the implications of or choose to be in the enterprise of creating generative AI.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Critical AI
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/2834703x-11556029
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Don't Forget That There Are People in the Data: LLMs in the Context of Human Rights

Wendy H. Wong
1 citations
Critical AI
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
0.35
article

Don't Forget That There Are People in the Data: LLMs in the Context of Human Rights

Wendy H. Wong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Large language models (LLMs), and generative AI generally, raise significant concerns regarding human rights. Their promise in finding insights in patterns of data have to be weighed against potential risks to individuals and societies. The typical perspective, which emphasizes accuracy, capability, or scope of such systems, overlooks the fact that generative AI technologies exploit massive collections of data about human behaviors, thoughts, and ideas. The datafication of human life should be examined through the lens of human rights, specifically with regard to autonomy, dignity, equality, and community. This piece argues that discussions about LLMs and generative AI are inherently linked to data originated from individuals, whose information are embedded in the training data. Data are human rights issues because information about individuals are buried in the data. Technical solutions alone are insufficient to address the human rights distortions produced by LLMs. Policy should focus instead on the fact that data are collected on rights-bearing individuals and groups who have been given very little leeway to discuss the implications of or choose to be in the enterprise of creating generative AI.

Critical AIVol. 2(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.