Making Sense of the Technical Strengths and Limitations of LLMs

Abstract This article considers a question left open by Samuel R. Bowman's Critical AI article “Eight Things to Know about Large Language Models,” namely, how humanlike these systems’ representations might be. Reviewing the evidence Bowman provides and contrasting it with results from cognitive science, the article argues that these systems at best approximate the real-world information that people rely on, while lacking the compositional and productive mechanisms needed to put this information to use in humanlike ways. More generally, talk of representation is an inherently anthropomorphizing strategy that demands more rigorous practice from computer scientists but opens generative possibilities for humanistic interventions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Critical AI
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/2834703x-11556020
Primary Topic
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making Sense of the Technical Strengths and Limitations of LLMs

Matthew Stone
Critical AI
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
article

Making Sense of the Technical Strengths and Limitations of LLMs

Matthew Stone
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article considers a question left open by Samuel R. Bowman's Critical AI article “Eight Things to Know about Large Language Models,” namely, how humanlike these systems’ representations might be. Reviewing the evidence Bowman provides and contrasting it with results from cognitive science, the article argues that these systems at best approximate the real-world information that people rely on, while lacking the compositional and productive mechanisms needed to put this information to use in humanlike ways. More generally, talk of representation is an inherently anthropomorphizing strategy that demands more rigorous practice from computer scientists but opens generative possibilities for humanistic interventions.

Critical AIVol. 2(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Making Sense of the Technical Strengths and Limitations of LLMs — Matthew Stone · Critical AI (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS