Test of Significancy and Error Associated with Road Traffic Crashes Data

This study compared the performance of Poisson regression, negative binomial regression and generalized negative binomial regression models using road traffic crashes data collected from Ekiti state command of Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC). The method of maximum likelihood estimation was employed to determine the parameter estimate for each models, the significance of each variable consider were examined. The criteria used in selecting the best model fitted are Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion and Deviance. R software package was used in analysing the data. Firstly multicollinearity was tested to determine if there is high correlation between the predictor variables. Data were analysed and the result from the three model were compared using Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and the deviance.The result from the three models were compared using AIC, BIC and Deviance, AIC values for the models are (414.79, 476.8 and 587.312), BIC values (490.8873, 495.59 and 589.321) and Deviance value (61.93, 66.927 and 69.927) respectively. Generalized negative binomial regression (GNBR) had the least value of AIC and BIC, thus consider as the best model for analyzing road traffic crashes data in Ekiti state, Nigeria. Having shown a smaller AIC, BIC and deviance values, the generalized negative binomial was consider a better fit model when analysing road traffic crashes in Ekiti state, Nigeria.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of research and scientific innovation
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51244/ijrsi.2025.12040135
Primary Topic
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Test of Significancy and Error Associated with Road Traffic Crashes Data

Ayeni Taiwo Michael, Ogunwale Olukunle Daniel, Odukoya Elijah Ayooluwa, Ancy Emmanuel et al.
International journal of research and scientific innovation
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
article

Test of Significancy and Error Associated with Road Traffic Crashes Data

Ayeni Taiwo Michael, Ogunwale Olukunle Daniel, Odukoya Elijah Ayooluwa, Ancy Emmanuel, IIesanmi Anthony Opeyemi
article en

Abstract

This study compared the performance of Poisson regression, negative binomial regression and generalized negative binomial regression models using road traffic crashes data collected from Ekiti state command of Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC). The method of maximum likelihood estimation was employed to determine the parameter estimate for each models, the significance of each variable consider were examined. The criteria used in selecting the best model fitted are Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion and Deviance. R software package was used in analysing the data. Firstly multicollinearity was tested to determine if there is high correlation between the predictor variables. Data were analysed and the result from the three model were compared using Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and the deviance.The result from the three models were compared using AIC, BIC and Deviance, AIC values for the models are (414.79, 476.8 and 587.312), BIC values (490.8873, 495.59 and 589.321) and Deviance value (61.93, 66.927 and 69.927) respectively. Generalized negative binomial regression (GNBR) had the least value of AIC and BIC, thus consider as the best model for analyzing road traffic crashes data in Ekiti state, Nigeria. Having shown a smaller AIC, BIC and deviance values, the generalized negative binomial was consider a better fit model when analysing road traffic crashes in Ekiti state, Nigeria.

International journal of research and scientific innovationVol. XII(IV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.