A Contrastive Analysis of Basic Sentence Patterns in Arabic and Acehnese

This study aims to compare the sentence structure patterns in Arabic and Acehnese. This research employs a qualitative method with a contrastive approach. Data collection was conducted through documentation, and data analysis utilized a contrastive analysis technique that compares the basic sentence patterns in Arabic and Acehnese. The data sources for this study include conversations in A cehnese and Arabic, as well as reference books. The data sources for this study include conversations in Acehnese and Arabic, as well as reference books. By using the contrastive analysis approach of the sentence patterns in Arabic and Acehnese, this study reveal that basic sentence patterns in Arabic share similarities with Acehnese, particularly the S+P (Subject + Predicate) pattern and the presence of predicate elements that are not limited to verbs. Additionally, certain sentence patterns are found in Arabic but not in Acehnese, and vice versa. For instance, the Object + Predicate + Subject structure in Arabic does not appear in Acehnese. In Acehnese, sentences are also not typically initiated with a verb-based predicate. In cases where Arabic uses transitive verbs, the structure tends to follow a Predicate + Subject + Object pattern, whereas the Subject + Predicate + Object structure in Acehnese is rarely found in Arabic sentences. Furthermore, there is no rule in Acehnese that places the object at the beginning of the sentence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PROCEEDINGS Meulaboh International Conference on Islamic Studies
Published
2024-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47498/miconis.v1i.3666
Primary Topic
English Language Learning and Teaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Contrastive Analysis of Basic Sentence Patterns in Arabic and Acehnese

Hadi Setiawan, Nelita Indah Islami
PROCEEDINGS Meulaboh International Conference on Islamic Studies
English Language Learning and Teaching
article

A Contrastive Analysis of Basic Sentence Patterns in Arabic and Acehnese

Hadi Setiawan, Nelita Indah Islami
article en

Abstract

This study aims to compare the sentence structure patterns in Arabic and Acehnese. This research employs a qualitative method with a contrastive approach. Data collection was conducted through documentation, and data analysis utilized a contrastive analysis technique that compares the basic sentence patterns in Arabic and Acehnese. The data sources for this study include conversations in A cehnese and Arabic, as well as reference books. The data sources for this study include conversations in Acehnese and Arabic, as well as reference books. By using the contrastive analysis approach of the sentence patterns in Arabic and Acehnese, this study reveal that basic sentence patterns in Arabic share similarities with Acehnese, particularly the S+P (Subject + Predicate) pattern and the presence of predicate elements that are not limited to verbs. Additionally, certain sentence patterns are found in Arabic but not in Acehnese, and vice versa. For instance, the Object + Predicate + Subject structure in Arabic does not appear in Acehnese. In Acehnese, sentences are also not typically initiated with a verb-based predicate. In cases where Arabic uses transitive verbs, the structure tends to follow a Predicate + Subject + Object pattern, whereas the Subject + Predicate + Object structure in Acehnese is rarely found in Arabic sentences. Furthermore, there is no rule in Acehnese that places the object at the beginning of the sentence.

PROCEEDINGS Meulaboh International Conference on Islamic StudiesVol. 1
Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
English Language Learning and Teaching
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.