BT2Automata: Expressing Behavior Trees as Automata for Formal Control Synthesis

This research presents a novel approach to bridging the gap between the interpretable and flexible nature of Behavior Trees (BTs) and the rigorous formal verification and synthesis capabilities of temporal logics. Temporal logics, such as Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) and Metric Interval Temporal Logic (MITL), are widely used for task specification due to their intuitive syntax for expressing temporally evolving behaviors. However, encoding complex task dependencies and recovery actions in temporal logic can lead to intractability. BTs, known for their modular structure and dynamic adaptability, have gained popularity in robotics for task specification. Despite the advantages of BTs, their flexible structure complicates formal analysis for safety and performance guarantees, limiting their use in control synthesis. This work presents a novel approach by translating BTs into Timed Automata (TA), thus enabling falsification (counterexample generation) with Uppaal to identify inconsistencies and ensure language completeness, especially when defined with timing constraints. This integration allows for the detection of potential inconsistencies, the monitoring of temporal properties, and the synthesis of automaton and sampling based control strategies that guarantee satisfaction of task objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3716863.3718042
Primary Topic
Formal Methods in Verification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BT2Automata: Expressing Behavior Trees as Automata for Formal Control Synthesis

Aniruddh G. Puranic, John S. Baras, Călin Belta, Ryan Matheu
Formal Methods in Verification
article

BT2Automata: Expressing Behavior Trees as Automata for Formal Control Synthesis

Aniruddh G. Puranic, John S. Baras, Călin Belta, Ryan Matheu
article en

Abstract

This research presents a novel approach to bridging the gap between the interpretable and flexible nature of Behavior Trees (BTs) and the rigorous formal verification and synthesis capabilities of temporal logics. Temporal logics, such as Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) and Metric Interval Temporal Logic (MITL), are widely used for task specification due to their intuitive syntax for expressing temporally evolving behaviors. However, encoding complex task dependencies and recovery actions in temporal logic can lead to intractability. BTs, known for their modular structure and dynamic adaptability, have gained popularity in robotics for task specification. Despite the advantages of BTs, their flexible structure complicates formal analysis for safety and performance guarantees, limiting their use in control synthesis. This work presents a novel approach by translating BTs into Timed Automata (TA), thus enabling falsification (counterexample generation) with Uppaal to identify inconsistencies and ensure language completeness, especially when defined with timing constraints. This integration allows for the detection of potential inconsistencies, the monitoring of temporal properties, and the synthesis of automaton and sampling based control strategies that guarantee satisfaction of task objectives.

University of Maryland, College Park (US)
National Science Foundation, Office of Naval Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Formal Methods in Verification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.