Accuracy validation of patient-specific 3D-printed acetabular revision prostheses: A stereotactic accuracy analysis

Assessing the positioning of prostheses after surgery is essential for evaluating therapeutic efficacy and optimizing surgical methods in three-dimensional (3D)-printed patient-specific acetabular revision implants. However, the lack of an effective 3D accuracy assessment framework for these customized implants has impeded the development of standardized benchmarks for verifying spatial alignment between intraoperative placement and preoperative digital planning. To bridge this gap, we introduce a novel evaluation system that integrates point localization, vector-based angular assessment, and volumetric overlap analysis to comprehensively quantify alignment between implanted prostheses and preoperative templates. Patients were classified into cohorts according to postoperative Harris Hip Scores (HHS) and complication profiles, differentiating a “better outcome” group (HHS ≥ 80, no major complications) from a “regular outcome” group. A computed tomography (CT)-based pelvic 3D coordinate system, established through anatomical landmarks, facilitated comparative analyses of intergroup variations in positional deviation, angular deviation, and volumetric overlap accuracy. The system’s reliability was confirmed via inter- and intra-observer consistency tests. Findings revealed outstanding measurement consistency (κ > 0.8). Compared to the regular outcome group, patients with better outcomes demonstrated significantly lower positional deviations (p < 0.001) and angular deviations (p = 0.003), along with superior volumetric overlap accuracy (p < 0.001). This CT-guided stereotactic assessment system offers a clinically relevant, high-fidelity approach for evaluating postoperative implant placement in 3D-printed acetabular prostheses. Notably, it represents the first validated methodology leveraging a pelvic 3D coordinate framework for a comprehensive analysis of preoperative planning versus postoperative implant positioning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Bioprinting
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb025120096
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy validation of patient-specific 3D-printed acetabular revision prostheses: A stereotactic accuracy analysis

Yongqiang Hao, Zhaoyang Ran, Liang Deng, Dinghao Luo et al.
International Journal of Bioprinting
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

Accuracy validation of patient-specific 3D-printed acetabular revision prostheses: A stereotactic accuracy analysis

Yongqiang Hao, Zhaoyang Ran, Liang Deng, Dinghao Luo, Junxiang Wu
article en

Abstract

Assessing the positioning of prostheses after surgery is essential for evaluating therapeutic efficacy and optimizing surgical methods in three-dimensional (3D)-printed patient-specific acetabular revision implants. However, the lack of an effective 3D accuracy assessment framework for these customized implants has impeded the development of standardized benchmarks for verifying spatial alignment between intraoperative placement and preoperative digital planning. To bridge this gap, we introduce a novel evaluation system that integrates point localization, vector-based angular assessment, and volumetric overlap analysis to comprehensively quantify alignment between implanted prostheses and preoperative templates. Patients were classified into cohorts according to postoperative Harris Hip Scores (HHS) and complication profiles, differentiating a “better outcome” group (HHS ≥ 80, no major complications) from a “regular outcome” group. A computed tomography (CT)-based pelvic 3D coordinate system, established through anatomical landmarks, facilitated comparative analyses of intergroup variations in positional deviation, angular deviation, and volumetric overlap accuracy. The system’s reliability was confirmed via inter- and intra-observer consistency tests. Findings revealed outstanding measurement consistency (κ > 0.8). Compared to the regular outcome group, patients with better outcomes demonstrated significantly lower positional deviations (p < 0.001) and angular deviations (p = 0.003), along with superior volumetric overlap accuracy (p < 0.001). This CT-guided stereotactic assessment system offers a clinically relevant, high-fidelity approach for evaluating postoperative implant placement in 3D-printed acetabular prostheses. Notably, it represents the first validated methodology leveraging a pelvic 3D coordinate framework for a comprehensive analysis of preoperative planning versus postoperative implant positioning.

International Journal of BioprintingVol. 0(0)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.