Towards a Holistic Doctoral Supervision in Africa: An Input-Output Approach

Aim/Purpose: This study examines the challenges in doctoral education supervision support within African universities, focusing on the need for effective strategies to meet the increasing demand for quality doctoral education. Background: The rapid socio-economic development in Africa has put pressure on higher education systems to meet the growing demand for quality doctoral education. Some African universities are attempting to produce doctoral degrees with minimal resources while maintaining doctorateness but are facing criticism from policymakers and stakeholders. The term “doctorateness” refers to the attributes of a doctoral student, including their research strategy, knowledge gaps, and unique contributions to the field. It is frequently seen as a turning point in the PhD process. Methodology: The research uses a critical literature review methodology to propose an input-output support model, arguing that universities should consider doctoral supervision as an input-output model to improve the quality and versatility of doctoral graduates. Contribution: The review presents a model and debate on doctoral education supervision support in a developing context, highlighting both theory and practice. Findings: The study suggests that universities should adopt an “input-output model” for doctoral supervision to improve the quality and suitability of doctoral holders for various employment opportunities. Recommendations for Practitioners: Based on a critical literature review, the study proposes that practitioners rethink doctorateness as an input-output approach to enhance their supervision skills. Recommendation for Researchers: The study contributes to the existing knowledge on doctoral education supervision and encourages further empirical study to validate the proposed model. Impact on Society: Doctoral education is crucial for solving societal problems, producing quality scientific research, preparing academics for future work environments, and serving as a bridge between academia, research, and society. Future Research: The study provides valuable insights and debates but requires further empirical research to validate its applicability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of doctoral studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28945/5468
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a Holistic Doctoral Supervision in Africa: An Input-Output Approach

Joseph Evans Agolla, Mmabaledi Seeletso
International journal of doctoral studies
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

Towards a Holistic Doctoral Supervision in Africa: An Input-Output Approach

Joseph Evans Agolla, Mmabaledi Seeletso
article en

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: This study examines the challenges in doctoral education supervision support within African universities, focusing on the need for effective strategies to meet the increasing demand for quality doctoral education. Background: The rapid socio-economic development in Africa has put pressure on higher education systems to meet the growing demand for quality doctoral education. Some African universities are attempting to produce doctoral degrees with minimal resources while maintaining doctorateness but are facing criticism from policymakers and stakeholders. The term “doctorateness” refers to the attributes of a doctoral student, including their research strategy, knowledge gaps, and unique contributions to the field. It is frequently seen as a turning point in the PhD process. Methodology: The research uses a critical literature review methodology to propose an input-output support model, arguing that universities should consider doctoral supervision as an input-output model to improve the quality and versatility of doctoral graduates. Contribution: The review presents a model and debate on doctoral education supervision support in a developing context, highlighting both theory and practice. Findings: The study suggests that universities should adopt an “input-output model” for doctoral supervision to improve the quality and suitability of doctoral holders for various employment opportunities. Recommendations for Practitioners: Based on a critical literature review, the study proposes that practitioners rethink doctorateness as an input-output approach to enhance their supervision skills. Recommendation for Researchers: The study contributes to the existing knowledge on doctoral education supervision and encourages further empirical study to validate the proposed model. Impact on Society: Doctoral education is crucial for solving societal problems, producing quality scientific research, preparing academics for future work environments, and serving as a bridge between academia, research, and society. Future Research: The study provides valuable insights and debates but requires further empirical research to validate its applicability.

International journal of doctoral studiesVol. 20
Botswana Open University (BW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.