AlphaFold 3 modeling of DNA nanomotifs: is it reliable?

Being able to accurately predict structures is highly desirable for nanoengineering with DNA and other biomolecules. The newly launched AlphaFold 3 (AF3) provides a potential platform for this purpose. In this work, we have used AF3 to model a list of commonly used DNA nanomotifs and compared the AF3 structures with the experimentally observed structures reported in the literature. For asymmetric motifs, AF3 structures are consistent with the experimental observations; but for symmetric motifs, AF3 structures are often substantially different from experimental observations. However, the fails can be rescued if the symmetric motifs are converted into corresponding asymmetric motifs by breaking DNA sequence symmetry while maintaining the backbone symmetry. This study suggests that while AF3 is immensely helpful, we as experimentalists should use it (as it currently stands) with caution. In addition, AF3 needs further development to incorporate the existing experimental data in the training dataset for AF3. At the current stage, a hybrid approach might be beneficial: theoretical modeling softwares calculate the detailed, 3D DNA structures based on secondary DNA structures inspired by experimental observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nanoscale Horizons
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5nh00059a
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AlphaFold 3 modeling of DNA nanomotifs: is it reliable?

Anusha Anusha, Jinyue Li, Chengde Mao, Yuntian Bai et al.
5 citations
Nanoscale Horizons
Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
4.03
article

AlphaFold 3 modeling of DNA nanomotifs: is it reliable?

Anusha Anusha, Jinyue Li, Chengde Mao, Yuntian Bai, Xindi Sun, Yuchen Zhang, Mauricio Cortés, Emile Joseph Batchelder-Schwab, Naseem Siraj, Rishab Jampana
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Being able to accurately predict structures is highly desirable for nanoengineering with DNA and other biomolecules. The newly launched AlphaFold 3 (AF3) provides a potential platform for this purpose. In this work, we have used AF3 to model a list of commonly used DNA nanomotifs and compared the AF3 structures with the experimentally observed structures reported in the literature. For asymmetric motifs, AF3 structures are consistent with the experimental observations; but for symmetric motifs, AF3 structures are often substantially different from experimental observations. However, the fails can be rescued if the symmetric motifs are converted into corresponding asymmetric motifs by breaking DNA sequence symmetry while maintaining the backbone symmetry. This study suggests that while AF3 is immensely helpful, we as experimentalists should use it (as it currently stands) with caution. In addition, AF3 needs further development to incorporate the existing experimental data in the training dataset for AF3. At the current stage, a hybrid approach might be beneficial: theoretical modeling softwares calculate the detailed, 3D DNA structures based on secondary DNA structures inspired by experimental observations.

Nanoscale HorizonsVol. 10(7)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
4.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AlphaFold 3 modeling of DNA nanomotifs: is it reliable? — Anusha Anusha, Jinyue Li, et al. · Nanoscale Horizons (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS