Comparative Analysis of AES, RC and Twofish Algorithms for Data Encryption and Decryption

This paper presents a comparative analysis of three widely used encryption algorithms, namely AES (Advanced Encryption Standard), RC (Rivest Cipher), and Twofish, with a focus on their performance in data encryption and decryption. The study aims to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these algorithms in terms of security, speed, and efficiency. The analysis involves benchmarking the algorithms against various performance metrics, including encryption time, decryption time, key size, and resistance against cryptanalysis attacks. Additionally, the research explores the impact of different data sizes and configurations on the performance of each algorithm. The findings of this study will provide valuable insights for decision-makers and practitioners in selecting the most suitable encryption algorithm for their specific needs, considering the tradeoffs between security and performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccit63348.2025.10989378
Primary Topic
Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of AES, RC and Twofish Algorithms for Data Encryption and Decryption

Sam Darshi, Mohammad Hafiz Mohd Yusof, Mohammed Balfaqih, Akram A. Almohammedi et al.
Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
article

Comparative Analysis of AES, RC and Twofish Algorithms for Data Encryption and Decryption

Sam Darshi, Mohammad Hafiz Mohd Yusof, Mohammed Balfaqih, Akram A. Almohammedi, Ahmad Faizal bin Tajuddin, Nadhem Qaid
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of three widely used encryption algorithms, namely AES (Advanced Encryption Standard), RC (Rivest Cipher), and Twofish, with a focus on their performance in data encryption and decryption. The study aims to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these algorithms in terms of security, speed, and efficiency. The analysis involves benchmarking the algorithms against various performance metrics, including encryption time, decryption time, key size, and resistance against cryptanalysis attacks. Additionally, the research explores the impact of different data sizes and configurations on the performance of each algorithm. The findings of this study will provide valuable insights for decision-makers and practitioners in selecting the most suitable encryption algorithm for their specific needs, considering the tradeoffs between security and performance.

Indian Institute of Technology Ropar (IN), Caterpillar (United States) (US), Koç University (TR), University of Jeddah (SA), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Universiti Teknologi MARA
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of AES, RC and Twofish Algorithms for Data Encryption and Decryption — Sam Darshi, Mohammad Hafiz Mohd Yusof, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS