A suitable manner? Seven key elements of a dialogical approach to the Mental Health Act Assessment

SUMMARY The Mental Health Act assessment or interview is a commonplace process in psychiatric services during which significant decisions are made about a person’s care and liberty. Individuals have reported negative experiences of being subjected to these assessments, at times even influencing their ongoing relationship with healthcare and recovery. A 2018 independent review of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA) for England and Wales identified numerous areas for practice improvement, including the identification of epistemic injustice as part of current MHA processes. Nevertheless, the assessment process has received little attention on how it is conducted, with scant clinical guidance, training or research available on the subject. In this article the authors propose seven principles that assessors can incorporate into interviews to improve the way in which the MHA assessment is conducted. These principles have been drawn from a dialogical and relational approach to psychiatric care called Open Dialogue. A dialogical approach to MHA assessment could improve experiences of being assessed, information gathered, and, by preserving therapeutic relationships, give better longer-term outcomes.