Improvement Path of the Preventive Function of Administrative Responsibility in Ecological Environment

在我国生态环境治理不断深化的过程中，传统行政责任在面对生态环境风险面前显露出不够灵活的缺陷。通过分析传统行政救济的局限，具体包括末端治理的落后，预防功能的限缩与对生态修复需求的难以回应等问题。结合以强调风险预防的当下，应当构建出一套以风险预防为主题的行政救济体系，针对这一需求应从以下四个方面进行完善：首先应当发挥行政救济在生态环境损害救济中的预防与应急补救环节中的主要功能，强调行政责任的前置。其次，在明确理念基础后进一步加强环境行政救济的规范表达并细化行政救济的执行内容，通过预防性行政救济的建立有效填补环境损害治理的空白，提供法律支撑。In the process of deepening ecological and environmental governance in China, the traditional administrative responsibility is not flexible enough in the face of ecological and environmental risks. This paper analyzes the limitations of traditional administrative remedies, including the backwardness of end-of-line governance, the limitation of prevention functions, and the difficulty in responding to the demand for ecological restoration. Combined with the emphasis on risk prevention, a set of administrative relief system with risk prevention as the theme should be constructed, and the following four aspects should be improved in response to this demand: first, the main functions of administrative relief and prevention and emergency remediation in the ecological and environmental damage relief should be played, and the pre-emptive administrative responsibility should be emphasized. Secondly, after clarifying the conceptual basis, we should further strengthen the normative expression of environmental administrative remedies and refine the implementation content of administrative remedies, so as to effectively fill the gaps in environmental damage governance and provide legal support through the establishment of preventive administrative remedies.