The (mis)match between civil society organisations and individual citizen participation

Governments increasingly engage individual citizens in the policy-making process and also in contexts where civil society organisations (CSOs) traditionally play a substantial role in this process by advocating for the interests and needs of their constituencies. Moreover, CSOs are in the position to enhance or obstruct different modes of individual citizen participation. The question of under which circumstances do CSOs find citizen participation modes legitimate is therefore important. We performed a multiple case study fitting a theoretical framework consisting of four different modes of individual citizen participation in local governments that affect CSOs. Our analyses are based on a framework of perceived legitimacy, including input, throughput and output legitimacy. Our results show that CSOs’ perceptions of legitimacy vary depending on the individual citizen participation mode and are nuanced by CSOs’ role in the initiative and by their trust in the local government.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Public Policy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4000/13zes
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The (mis)match between civil society organisations and individual citizen participation

Bernhard Liese, Bram Verschuere
1 citations
International Review of Public Policy
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
4.20
article

The (mis)match between civil society organisations and individual citizen participation

Bernhard Liese, Bram Verschuere
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Governments increasingly engage individual citizens in the policy-making process and also in contexts where civil society organisations (CSOs) traditionally play a substantial role in this process by advocating for the interests and needs of their constituencies. Moreover, CSOs are in the position to enhance or obstruct different modes of individual citizen participation. The question of under which circumstances do CSOs find citizen participation modes legitimate is therefore important. We performed a multiple case study fitting a theoretical framework consisting of four different modes of individual citizen participation in local governments that affect CSOs. Our analyses are based on a framework of perceived legitimacy, including input, throughput and output legitimacy. Our results show that CSOs’ perceptions of legitimacy vary depending on the individual citizen participation mode and are nuanced by CSOs’ role in the initiative and by their trust in the local government.

International Review of Public PolicyVol. 7(1)
Universiteit Gent, Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The (mis)match between civil society organisations and individual citizen participation — Bernhard Liese, Bram Verschuere · International Review of Public Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS