[Artificial intelligence-based automated assessment of coronary flow reserve from angiography and the impact of different vasodilators].

<b>Objectives:</b> To explore the feasibility of a coronary angiography-based method developed with artificial intelligence which was able to automatically and quickly calculate coronary volumetric blood flow and coronary flow reserve (CFR), and explore the differences in CFR after injection of different vasodilators. <b>Methods:</b> This was a observational study screening patients with suspected coronary artery disease who underwent coronary angiography From June to September 2022 in Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Patients without obstructive coronary artery disease in the left anterior descending artery (<50% diameter stenosis by visual) and accompanied by coronary slow flow phenomenon (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade ≤2) were enrolled. According to pre-specified coronary angiography acquisition protocol, one angiographic image in optimal projection was acquired for each of the following five states: baseline when none of the vasodilators was injected (resting state), intracoronary injection of 200 μg nitroglycerin (nitroglycerin-induced hyperemia), intracoronary injection of 100 μg adenosine (adenosine-induced hyperemia), 5 minutes after cessation of adenosine injection (resting state 2), and intracoronary injection of 4 mg nicorandil (nicorandil-induced hyperemia). Coronary volumetric blood flow and CFR were assessed in a fully automatic manner at an independent core laboratory. One-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to detect the differences in coronary volumetric blood flow at five states and the differences in CFR after injection of different vasodilators. <b>Results:</b> A total of 21 eligible patients were included. The age was (62±9) years, and 5 (24%) were female. Coronary volumetric blood flow at five states and CFR after injection of different vasodilators were successfully calculated in all patients, with a feasibility of 100% (21/21) for CFR. Resting coronary volumetric blood flow was (80.6±12.4) ml/min. Using this as a reference, the volumetric blood flow increased to (167.7±30.5) ml/min under nitroglycerin-induced hyperemia (adjusted <i>P</i><0.001), and remained at (171.5±23.1) ml/min under adenosine-induced hyperemia (adjusted <i>P</i><0.001). The volumetric blood flow under resting state 2 was (83.8±15.6) ml/min, returning to baseline level (adjusted <i>P</i>=0.94). Under nicorandil-induced hyperemia, the coronary volumetric blood flow increased again to (182.9±28.3) ml/min (adjusted <i>P</i><0.001). CFR was 2.09±0.29, 2.15±0.27, and 2.29±0.29 after injection of nitroglycerin, adenosine, and nicorandil, respectively(<i>P</i>=0.034). Using CFR after adenosine injection as a reference, CFR after nicorandil injection was higher (adjusted <i>P</i>=0.044). Using the coronary volumetric blood flow under resting state 2 as the baseline flow for CFR calculation, there was no statistically significant difference compared to the CFR calculated using the volumetric blood flow under resting state (all <i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Preliminary findings confirm the high feasibility of rapid, automated assessment of coronary volumetric blood flow and CFR from a single angiographic projection, as well as good reproducibility in calculating baseline volumetric blood flow. In patients with coronary slow flow, the CFR after nicorandil injection is significantly higher than that after adenosine injection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20250128-00075
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

[Artificial intelligence-based automated assessment of coronary flow reserve from angiography and the impact of different vasodilators].

H L Zhang, Shengxian Tu, Bo Yang, Yonglin Wu et al.
PubMed
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

[Artificial intelligence-based automated assessment of coronary flow reserve from angiography and the impact of different vasodilators].

H L Zhang, Shengxian Tu, Bo Yang, Yonglin Wu, Miao Chu, Dexin Ding, R G Wei
article en

Abstract

<b>Objectives:</b> To explore the feasibility of a coronary angiography-based method developed with artificial intelligence which was able to automatically and quickly calculate coronary volumetric blood flow and coronary flow reserve (CFR), and explore the differences in CFR after injection of different vasodilators. <b>Methods:</b> This was a observational study screening patients with suspected coronary artery disease who underwent coronary angiography From June to September 2022 in Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Patients without obstructive coronary artery disease in the left anterior descending artery (<50% diameter stenosis by visual) and accompanied by coronary slow flow phenomenon (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade ≤2) were enrolled. According to pre-specified coronary angiography acquisition protocol, one angiographic image in optimal projection was acquired for each of the following five states: baseline when none of the vasodilators was injected (resting state), intracoronary injection of 200 μg nitroglycerin (nitroglycerin-induced hyperemia), intracoronary injection of 100 μg adenosine (adenosine-induced hyperemia), 5 minutes after cessation of adenosine injection (resting state 2), and intracoronary injection of 4 mg nicorandil (nicorandil-induced hyperemia). Coronary volumetric blood flow and CFR were assessed in a fully automatic manner at an independent core laboratory. One-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to detect the differences in coronary volumetric blood flow at five states and the differences in CFR after injection of different vasodilators. <b>Results:</b> A total of 21 eligible patients were included. The age was (62±9) years, and 5 (24%) were female. Coronary volumetric blood flow at five states and CFR after injection of different vasodilators were successfully calculated in all patients, with a feasibility of 100% (21/21) for CFR. Resting coronary volumetric blood flow was (80.6±12.4) ml/min. Using this as a reference, the volumetric blood flow increased to (167.7±30.5) ml/min under nitroglycerin-induced hyperemia (adjusted <i>P</i><0.001), and remained at (171.5±23.1) ml/min under adenosine-induced hyperemia (adjusted <i>P</i><0.001). The volumetric blood flow under resting state 2 was (83.8±15.6) ml/min, returning to baseline level (adjusted <i>P</i>=0.94). Under nicorandil-induced hyperemia, the coronary volumetric blood flow increased again to (182.9±28.3) ml/min (adjusted <i>P</i><0.001). CFR was 2.09±0.29, 2.15±0.27, and 2.29±0.29 after injection of nitroglycerin, adenosine, and nicorandil, respectively(<i>P</i>=0.034). Using CFR after adenosine injection as a reference, CFR after nicorandil injection was higher (adjusted <i>P</i>=0.044). Using the coronary volumetric blood flow under resting state 2 as the baseline flow for CFR calculation, there was no statistically significant difference compared to the CFR calculated using the volumetric blood flow under resting state (all <i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Preliminary findings confirm the high feasibility of rapid, automated assessment of coronary volumetric blood flow and CFR from a single angiographic projection, as well as good reproducibility in calculating baseline volumetric blood flow. In patients with coronary slow flow, the CFR after nicorandil injection is significantly higher than that after adenosine injection.

PubMedVol. 53(5)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.