[Evaluation and Analysis of Carbon Reduction Effect of Domestic Waste Incineration Power Generation].

The annual average carbon dioxide emissions were evaluated from a large-scale domestic waste incineration power generation project in Beijing using the Chinese Certified Emission Reduction (CCER) method. Compared with landfill methods without landfill gas recovery, the carbon reduction effect of this project was quantitatively assessed. The results showed that the baseline carbon emission (calculated by CO<sub>2</sub>-eq, the same below) per unit of waste was 1.041 t·t<sup>-1</sup>. The carbon emission of waste incineration power generation unit waste was 0.457 t·t<sup>-1</sup>. The contribution of leakage emission was relatively low and the carbon emission per unit of waste was nearly zero. The main source of carbon emission came from waste incineration with carbon emission per unit of waste being 0.456 t·t<sup>-1</sup>, accounting for 99.89% of the total waste incineration emission. The annual carbon emission reduction for the project, which incinerated 1.83 million t of waste per year, was 1.063 5 million t, with a carbon emission reduction per unit of waste of 0.581 t·t<sup>-1</sup>. The results of this case study were important for establishing the carbon emission baseline in Beijing's waste management industry and achieving the goals of carbon peak and carbon neutrality in China. It serves as a crucial theoretical foundation for the development of comprehensive and refined carbon accounting standards and policy frameworks in the solid waste management sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202405249
Primary Topic
Metallurgy and Material Science
Type
article
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

[Evaluation and Analysis of Carbon Reduction Effect of Domestic Waste Incineration Power Generation].

P. P. Wang, Xianglan Li, Jian-Qiang Guo, Jingqi Dong et al.
PubMed
Metallurgy and Material Science
article

[Evaluation and Analysis of Carbon Reduction Effect of Domestic Waste Incineration Power Generation].

P. P. Wang, Xianglan Li, Jian-Qiang Guo, Jingqi Dong, Chaofeng Sang, Ximin Hu, Caocao Chen, Hongzhen Zhang, Jing Liu, Yue Huang, Chong Jia
article en

Abstract

The annual average carbon dioxide emissions were evaluated from a large-scale domestic waste incineration power generation project in Beijing using the Chinese Certified Emission Reduction (CCER) method. Compared with landfill methods without landfill gas recovery, the carbon reduction effect of this project was quantitatively assessed. The results showed that the baseline carbon emission (calculated by CO<sub>2</sub>-eq, the same below) per unit of waste was 1.041 t·t<sup>-1</sup>. The carbon emission of waste incineration power generation unit waste was 0.457 t·t<sup>-1</sup>. The contribution of leakage emission was relatively low and the carbon emission per unit of waste was nearly zero. The main source of carbon emission came from waste incineration with carbon emission per unit of waste being 0.456 t·t<sup>-1</sup>, accounting for 99.89% of the total waste incineration emission. The annual carbon emission reduction for the project, which incinerated 1.83 million t of waste per year, was 1.063 5 million t, with a carbon emission reduction per unit of waste of 0.581 t·t<sup>-1</sup>. The results of this case study were important for establishing the carbon emission baseline in Beijing's waste management industry and achieving the goals of carbon peak and carbon neutrality in China. It serves as a crucial theoretical foundation for the development of comprehensive and refined carbon accounting standards and policy frameworks in the solid waste management sector.

PubMedVol. 46(5)
Beijing Normal University (CN)
Metallurgy and Material Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.