Validation of indicators for the welfare assessment of captive Yangtze finless porpoises (<i>Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis</i>)

The Five Domains model (FDM) is a widely accepted framework for developing welfare assessment tools across various contexts, including wild animals under human care. However, only two protocols have been developed for captive cetaceans. This study aimed to create a welfare assessment protocol based on the FDM for captive Yangtze finless porpoises (YFPs; <i>Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis</i>). Indicators relevant to YFPs' welfare were selected via a literature review, and validated through two consecutive questionnaire surveys, four discussions with a panel of three experts, and a blind review conducted by three additional cetacean welfare experts. This process resulted in the validation of 46 welfare indicators, which were used to develop the Yangtze Finless Porpoise-Welfare Assessment Protocol (YFP-WAP) which, in its final version, contains 150 indicators. Moreover, intensity levels (the degree of impact of each indicator on the porpoises' welfare), valence (whether the indicator contributed positively or negatively to the porpoises' welfare state), and mental states associated with each indicator were also assigned by the panels of experts. Additionally, a confidence score was assigned to each indicator's intensity level, valence, and mental state that reflected experts' level of uncertainty regarding the indicator impact on the YFPs' welfare. This rigorous validation process provided transparency, helped ensure minimal bias, and reduced the likelihood of incorrect indicator elimination due to expert subjectivity. By integrating expert knowledge, the YFP-WAP provides a comprehensive approach to evaluating both positive and negative welfare states, supporting the ongoing care and management of YFPs in captivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Welfare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2025.19
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of indicators for the welfare assessment of captive Yangtze finless porpoises (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis)

Simona Normando, Déborah Temple, Agathe Serres, Xavier Manteca et al.
1 citations
Animal Welfare
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
2.35
article

Validation of indicators for the welfare assessment of captive Yangtze finless porpoises (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis)

Simona Normando, Déborah Temple, Agathe Serres, Xavier Manteca, Yujiang Hao, Sara Platto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Five Domains model (FDM) is a widely accepted framework for developing welfare assessment tools across various contexts, including wild animals under human care. However, only two protocols have been developed for captive cetaceans. This study aimed to create a welfare assessment protocol based on the FDM for captive Yangtze finless porpoises (YFPs; <i>Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis</i>). Indicators relevant to YFPs' welfare were selected via a literature review, and validated through two consecutive questionnaire surveys, four discussions with a panel of three experts, and a blind review conducted by three additional cetacean welfare experts. This process resulted in the validation of 46 welfare indicators, which were used to develop the Yangtze Finless Porpoise-Welfare Assessment Protocol (YFP-WAP) which, in its final version, contains 150 indicators. Moreover, intensity levels (the degree of impact of each indicator on the porpoises' welfare), valence (whether the indicator contributed positively or negatively to the porpoises' welfare state), and mental states associated with each indicator were also assigned by the panels of experts. Additionally, a confidence score was assigned to each indicator's intensity level, valence, and mental state that reflected experts' level of uncertainty regarding the indicator impact on the YFPs' welfare. This rigorous validation process provided transparency, helped ensure minimal bias, and reduced the likelihood of incorrect indicator elimination due to expert subjectivity. By integrating expert knowledge, the YFP-WAP provides a comprehensive approach to evaluating both positive and negative welfare states, supporting the ongoing care and management of YFPs in captivity.

Animal WelfareVol. 34
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), University of Padua (IT), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Jianghan University (CN), Institute of Hydrobiology (CN), Institute of Deep-Sea Science and Engineering (CN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
2.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.