Linked Resources in Debates About the German Network Enforcement Act on Twitter

This paper analyses linked resources in debates about the German Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) on Twitter. Public discourse about this law has been contentious in Germany and abroad with opponents of it cautioning against overblocking and threats of censorship, while supporters highlighted the necessity to hold platforms accountable for illegal content to protect minorities and eventually the democratic public sphere. The conversation on Twitter provides valuable insights into the stakeholders, topics, and communicative practices that shaped this discussion about platform regulation and free speech, which has substantially impacted the European digital policy agenda, eventually culminating in the Digital Services Act (DSA). We first collected tweets mentioning NetzDG and produced a network graph to visualise the interaction between accounts that took part in these debates based on their retweet activity. Then, we extracted every URL inserted in the tweets collected to understand what resources those accounts refer to. Findings revealed that accounts linked to the German right-wing party Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) tend to share links to so-called alternative online media sites and reference content of AfD politicians on other social media platforms (Eg.: Youtube and Facebook). The cluster composed of liberal tech, media, and legal experts, however, tends to reference specialized IT blogs and websites, while the cluster composed of accounts related to the German liberal Party (FDP) primarily linked content of the legacy media. These findings allow us to identify the informational resources and media that have had the greatest impact on the NetzDG discussion on Twitter through their relevance for the groups represented by the individual network clusters. Furthermore, they shed light on the ways in which this highly technical and juridical expert discourse concerning the regulation of speech online is translated for a discussion in broader society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Conference on Social Media
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34190/ecsm.12.1.3454
Primary Topic
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linked Resources in Debates About the German Network Enforcement Act on Twitter

Caio Mello, Jens Pohlmann, Karin León Henneberg
European Conference on Social Media
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
article

Linked Resources in Debates About the German Network Enforcement Act on Twitter

Caio Mello, Jens Pohlmann, Karin León Henneberg
article en

Abstract

This paper analyses linked resources in debates about the German Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) on Twitter. Public discourse about this law has been contentious in Germany and abroad with opponents of it cautioning against overblocking and threats of censorship, while supporters highlighted the necessity to hold platforms accountable for illegal content to protect minorities and eventually the democratic public sphere. The conversation on Twitter provides valuable insights into the stakeholders, topics, and communicative practices that shaped this discussion about platform regulation and free speech, which has substantially impacted the European digital policy agenda, eventually culminating in the Digital Services Act (DSA). We first collected tweets mentioning NetzDG and produced a network graph to visualise the interaction between accounts that took part in these debates based on their retweet activity. Then, we extracted every URL inserted in the tweets collected to understand what resources those accounts refer to. Findings revealed that accounts linked to the German right-wing party Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) tend to share links to so-called alternative online media sites and reference content of AfD politicians on other social media platforms (Eg.: Youtube and Facebook). The cluster composed of liberal tech, media, and legal experts, however, tends to reference specialized IT blogs and websites, while the cluster composed of accounts related to the German liberal Party (FDP) primarily linked content of the legacy media. These findings allow us to identify the informational resources and media that have had the greatest impact on the NetzDG discussion on Twitter through their relevance for the groups represented by the individual network clusters. Furthermore, they shed light on the ways in which this highly technical and juridical expert discourse concerning the regulation of speech online is translated for a discussion in broader society.

European Conference on Social MediaVol. 12(1)
University of Bremen (DE), University of Luxembourg (LU), University of California, Davis (US)
Universität Bremen
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.