Preoperative Central Sensitization Worsens Pain and Dissatisfaction Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Central sensitization (CS) has been identified as a significant factor influencing persistent pain and dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, its effect on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains largely unexplored. Unlike TKA, UKA preserves most native knee structures, with less bone cut, leading to different postoperative pain mechanisms. Nevertheless, the revision rate for unexplained pain following UKA is higher than after TKA. This study investigates the influence of preoperative CS on pain and dissatisfaction after UKA. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This retrospective cohort study included 121 patients who underwent primary UKA for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Patients were screened for CS preoperatively using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) and categorized into a CS group (CSI ≥ 40; n = 26) and a non-CS group (CSI < 40; n = 95). Clinical outcomes, including the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and patient satisfaction, were assessed at the 2-year postoperative follow-up visit. A multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for postoperative dissatisfaction. <i>Results</i>: The CS group reported significantly worse postoperative WOMAC pain, function, and total scores than the non-CS group (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). FJS was also significantly worse in the CS group than in the non-CS group (64.4 vs. 72.7, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Patient satisfaction was significantly lower in the CS group than in the non-CS group (65.4% vs. 95.8%, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patients with a CSI score ≥ 40 had an 11.349-fold increased likelihood of dissatisfaction after UKA (95% CI: 2.315-55.626, <i>p</i> = 0.003). <i>Conclusions</i>: This study underscores the importance of recognizing CS as a critical determinant of postoperative pain and functional recovery following UKA. Patients with high CSI scores experience greater pain, increased joint awareness, and overall poorer satisfaction despite technically successful surgeries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61050912
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preoperative Central Sensitization Worsens Pain and Dissatisfaction Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Keun-Young Choi, Man Soo Kim, Yong In
3 citations
Medicina
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
6.02
article

Preoperative Central Sensitization Worsens Pain and Dissatisfaction Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Keun-Young Choi, Man Soo Kim, Yong In
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Central sensitization (CS) has been identified as a significant factor influencing persistent pain and dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, its effect on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains largely unexplored. Unlike TKA, UKA preserves most native knee structures, with less bone cut, leading to different postoperative pain mechanisms. Nevertheless, the revision rate for unexplained pain following UKA is higher than after TKA. This study investigates the influence of preoperative CS on pain and dissatisfaction after UKA. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This retrospective cohort study included 121 patients who underwent primary UKA for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Patients were screened for CS preoperatively using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) and categorized into a CS group (CSI ≥ 40; n = 26) and a non-CS group (CSI < 40; n = 95). Clinical outcomes, including the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and patient satisfaction, were assessed at the 2-year postoperative follow-up visit. A multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for postoperative dissatisfaction. <i>Results</i>: The CS group reported significantly worse postoperative WOMAC pain, function, and total scores than the non-CS group (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). FJS was also significantly worse in the CS group than in the non-CS group (64.4 vs. 72.7, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Patient satisfaction was significantly lower in the CS group than in the non-CS group (65.4% vs. 95.8%, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patients with a CSI score ≥ 40 had an 11.349-fold increased likelihood of dissatisfaction after UKA (95% CI: 2.315-55.626, <i>p</i> = 0.003). <i>Conclusions</i>: This study underscores the importance of recognizing CS as a critical determinant of postoperative pain and functional recovery following UKA. Patients with high CSI scores experience greater pain, increased joint awareness, and overall poorer satisfaction despite technically successful surgeries.

MedicinaVol. 61(5)
The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR), Catholic University of Korea (KR)
National Research Foundation, Catholic University of Korea, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.