Optimization frameworks for bespoke sensory encoding in neuroprosthetics

Restoring natural sensation via neuroprosthetics relies on the possibility of encoding complex and nuanced information. For example, an ideal brain-machine interface with sensory feedback would provide the user with sensation about movement, pressure, curvature, texture, etc. Despite advances in neural interfaces that allow for complex stimulation patterns (e.g., multisite stimulation or the possibility of targeting a precise neural ensemble), a key question remains: How can we best exploit the potential of these technologies? The increasing number of electrodes coupled with more parameters being explored leads to an exponential increase in the number of possible combinations, making a brute-force approach, such as systematic search, impractical. This Perspective outlines three different optimization frameworks-namely, the explicit, physiological, and self-optimized methods-allowing one to potentially converge faster toward effective parameters. Although our focus will be on the somatosensory system, these frameworks are flexible and applicable to various sensory systems (e.g., vision) and stimulator types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
APL Bioengineering
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0249434
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization frameworks for bespoke sensory encoding in neuroprosthetics

Solaiman Shokur, F. Joel W.-M. Leong, Silvestro Micera
2 links
APL Bioengineering
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
article

Optimization frameworks for bespoke sensory encoding in neuroprosthetics

Solaiman Shokur, F. Joel W.-M. Leong, Silvestro Micera
article en

Abstract

Restoring natural sensation via neuroprosthetics relies on the possibility of encoding complex and nuanced information. For example, an ideal brain-machine interface with sensory feedback would provide the user with sensation about movement, pressure, curvature, texture, etc. Despite advances in neural interfaces that allow for complex stimulation patterns (e.g., multisite stimulation or the possibility of targeting a precise neural ensemble), a key question remains: How can we best exploit the potential of these technologies? The increasing number of electrodes coupled with more parameters being explored leads to an exponential increase in the number of possible combinations, making a brute-force approach, such as systematic search, impractical. This Perspective outlines three different optimization frameworks-namely, the explicit, physiological, and self-optimized methods-allowing one to potentially converge faster toward effective parameters. Although our focus will be on the somatosensory system, these frameworks are flexible and applicable to various sensory systems (e.g., vision) and stimulator types.

APL BioengineeringVol. 9(2)
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH), University of Lausanne (CH)
National Science Foundation, Fondation Bertarelli, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.