Evaluative Judgment: A Validation Process to Measure Teachers’ Professional Competencies in Learning Assessments

This article deals with teachers’ professional development, focusing specifically on their competencies to assess learning. Research in this field has shown a lack of instruments for measuring such competencies in practicing teachers. In this context, we present the validation process of such an instrument, called Classroom Evaluative Judgment, which is designed to assess teachers’ competencies in evaluating their students’ school work. We adopt a quantitative approach, with a non-experimental and sequential design. First, the instrument was subjected to content validation through expert judgment. Subsequently, a pilot test was carried out with an unintentional sample, applying statistical reliability analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to ensure the internal consistency of the instrument with respect to its theoretical basis. Finally, we validated the instrument with 266 participants, obtaining high levels of internal consistency and statistical reliability. The results support the soundness of the proposed model and its usefulness for measuring professional teaching competencies in the field of learning assessment. Its application in real contexts of professional practice could open new lines of research on the evaluative judgment of teachers and the strengthening of their evaluative identity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050624
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluative Judgment: A Validation Process to Measure Teachers’ Professional Competencies in Learning Assessments

Félix González‐Carrasco, José Miguel Olave Astorga
1 links
Education Sciences
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Evaluative Judgment: A Validation Process to Measure Teachers’ Professional Competencies in Learning Assessments

Félix González‐Carrasco, José Miguel Olave Astorga
article en

Abstract

This article deals with teachers’ professional development, focusing specifically on their competencies to assess learning. Research in this field has shown a lack of instruments for measuring such competencies in practicing teachers. In this context, we present the validation process of such an instrument, called Classroom Evaluative Judgment, which is designed to assess teachers’ competencies in evaluating their students’ school work. We adopt a quantitative approach, with a non-experimental and sequential design. First, the instrument was subjected to content validation through expert judgment. Subsequently, a pilot test was carried out with an unintentional sample, applying statistical reliability analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to ensure the internal consistency of the instrument with respect to its theoretical basis. Finally, we validated the instrument with 266 participants, obtaining high levels of internal consistency and statistical reliability. The results support the soundness of the proposed model and its usefulness for measuring professional teaching competencies in the field of learning assessment. Its application in real contexts of professional practice could open new lines of research on the evaluative judgment of teachers and the strengthening of their evaluative identity.

Education SciencesVol. 15(5)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (CL)
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.