Chiefs’ Courts and Peacebuilding in South Sudan: Bridging Tradition and Modernity

In response to the shortcomings of liberal peacebuilding, contemporary peacebuilding literature calls for localised approaches to conflict prevention in postconflict countries. Chiefs’ courts in South Sudan are one example of a localised approach that has been instrumental to traditional peacebuilding, addressing disputes and food shortages during famines. This article argues that greater incorporation of chiefs’ courts into a comprehensive, place-based approach presents significant opportunities for strengthening peace in South Sudan. However, the article also argues that there is a need for further critical analysis of ways in which chiefs’ courts align with contemporary peacebuilding standards and practices. Examining the effectiveness and challenges of this Indigenous peacebuilding mechanism, this article calls for a more nuanced and community-driven peacebuilding approach in South Sudan that recognises and leverages the agency and expertise of local actors, alongside international partners, to promote sustainable peace.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Peacebuilding & Development
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15423166251338529
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chiefs’ Courts and Peacebuilding in South Sudan: Bridging Tradition and Modernity

Kearrin Sims, Kuol Garang
Journal of Peacebuilding & Development
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

Chiefs’ Courts and Peacebuilding in South Sudan: Bridging Tradition and Modernity

Kearrin Sims, Kuol Garang
article en

Abstract

In response to the shortcomings of liberal peacebuilding, contemporary peacebuilding literature calls for localised approaches to conflict prevention in postconflict countries. Chiefs’ courts in South Sudan are one example of a localised approach that has been instrumental to traditional peacebuilding, addressing disputes and food shortages during famines. This article argues that greater incorporation of chiefs’ courts into a comprehensive, place-based approach presents significant opportunities for strengthening peace in South Sudan. However, the article also argues that there is a need for further critical analysis of ways in which chiefs’ courts align with contemporary peacebuilding standards and practices. Examining the effectiveness and challenges of this Indigenous peacebuilding mechanism, this article calls for a more nuanced and community-driven peacebuilding approach in South Sudan that recognises and leverages the agency and expertise of local actors, alongside international partners, to promote sustainable peace.

Journal of Peacebuilding & DevelopmentVol. 20(3)
James Cook University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Chiefs’ Courts and Peacebuilding in South Sudan: Bridging Tradition and Modernity — Kearrin Sims, Kuol Garang · Journal of Peacebuilding & Development (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS