Malaria Influenced Outcomes of Yorktown Sieges: 1781 and 1862

During two critically important battles on the Yorktown peninsula in Virginia in 1781, during the American Revolutionary War and in 1862 during the US Civil War, malaria played a vital role in determining how many soldiers were fit to fight. Lord Cornwallis' British Army was besieged by a Franco-American Army under Washington and forced to surrender when the Royal Navy could not relieve them. At the time of the October capitulation, most British soldiers were sick from fevers probably due to malaria whereas less than 8% of American soldiers were ill. This differential disease effect was likely due to lower exposure and partial immunity in the Americans. A very different military campaign in the same area was also disrupted by malaria more than 80 years later during the US Civil War. General McClellan failed in his attempt to capture the rebel capital at Richmond when forced to camp in the swamps of the Chickahominy River by Confederate defensive works leading to a malaria epidemic in summer 1862. Disease did not solely determine the military outcome, but malaria strongly influenced how many soldiers could be maintained in a field army. Malaria remains capable of causing mass casualties in deployed military forces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.25-0186
Primary Topic
Travel-related health issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Malaria Influenced Outcomes of Yorktown Sieges: 1781 and 1862

G. Dennis Shanks
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Travel-related health issues
article

Malaria Influenced Outcomes of Yorktown Sieges: 1781 and 1862

G. Dennis Shanks
article en

Abstract

During two critically important battles on the Yorktown peninsula in Virginia in 1781, during the American Revolutionary War and in 1862 during the US Civil War, malaria played a vital role in determining how many soldiers were fit to fight. Lord Cornwallis' British Army was besieged by a Franco-American Army under Washington and forced to surrender when the Royal Navy could not relieve them. At the time of the October capitulation, most British soldiers were sick from fevers probably due to malaria whereas less than 8% of American soldiers were ill. This differential disease effect was likely due to lower exposure and partial immunity in the Americans. A very different military campaign in the same area was also disrupted by malaria more than 80 years later during the US Civil War. General McClellan failed in his attempt to capture the rebel capital at Richmond when forced to camp in the swamps of the Chickahominy River by Confederate defensive works leading to a malaria epidemic in summer 1862. Disease did not solely determine the military outcome, but malaria strongly influenced how many soldiers could be maintained in a field army. Malaria remains capable of causing mass casualties in deployed military forces.

American Journal of Tropical Medicine and HygieneVol. 113(2)
The University of Queensland (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Travel-related health issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.