Visual physiology of Australian stingless bees

Stingless bees engage in a range of visually guided behaviours that require relatively high spatial resolution and contrast sensitivity. Although the eyes of honeybees, bumblebees, carpenter bees, and sweat bees have been studied extensively, there is limited knowledge of stingless bees. Here, we studied two sympatric Australian species, Tetragonula carbonaria and Austroplebeia australis, which are important crop pollinators. The bigger A. australis had more and larger ommatidial facets compared to T. carbonaria. Using pattern electroretinography, we showed that A. australis had higher contrast sensitivity (13.07) compared to T. carbonaria (5.99), but their spatial resolving power did not differ (0.53 cycles deg<sup>-1</sup>). We discuss these differences in visual physiology in the context of the distinct foraging behaviours of the two species.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-025-01740-x
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual physiology of Australian stingless bees

Bhavana Penmetcha, Nathan S. Hart, Ajay Narendra, Yuri Ogawa et al.
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
Plant and animal studies
article

Visual physiology of Australian stingless bees

Bhavana Penmetcha, Nathan S. Hart, Ajay Narendra, Yuri Ogawa, Laura A. Ryan
article en

Abstract

Stingless bees engage in a range of visually guided behaviours that require relatively high spatial resolution and contrast sensitivity. Although the eyes of honeybees, bumblebees, carpenter bees, and sweat bees have been studied extensively, there is limited knowledge of stingless bees. Here, we studied two sympatric Australian species, Tetragonula carbonaria and Austroplebeia australis, which are important crop pollinators. The bigger A. australis had more and larger ommatidial facets compared to T. carbonaria. Using pattern electroretinography, we showed that A. australis had higher contrast sensitivity (13.07) compared to T. carbonaria (5.99), but their spatial resolving power did not differ (0.53 cycles deg<sup>-1</sup>). We discuss these differences in visual physiology in the context of the distinct foraging behaviours of the two species.

Journal of Comparative Physiology AVol. 211(4)
The University of Sydney (AU), Flinders University (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Macquarie University, Australian Research Council
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Visual physiology of Australian stingless bees — Bhavana Penmetcha, Nathan S. Hart, et al. · Journal of Comparative Physiology A (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS