Political strategy and policy influence in Australian school funding: a study of key stakeholder responses to the 2017 federal reforms

Abstract School funding is widely acknowledged in policy and research as both a means of supporting student learning and a key strategy for promoting educational equity. This article analyses how key stakeholders responded to the events surrounding the 2017 school funding reforms put forward by the Coalition federal government and passed by the Australian parliament. Drawing on Bowe et al.’s (2017) theorisation of the Context of Practice phase of policymaking, the analysis positions the reform period as a critical stage in the broader policymaking cycle of the Review of Funding for Schooling (2011). The analysis highlights the political tensions, lobbying techniques, and strategic manoeuvring that played a role in shaping the outcomes of this key phase. At the same time, the work raises broader questions about the extent to which either of the two major political parties can be relied upon to consistently represent and advocate for the interests of students in under-resourced schools. Looking ahead and drawing on Ball’s (1994) Context of Political Strategy, three insights—targeted political engagement and strategic messaging; exerting political pressure on multiple fronts; and fluid political allegiances and coalition building—are presented to begin to further support equity-minded stakeholders to more effectively influence school funding policy in the future for students and schools who require extra support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Australian Educational Researcher
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-025-00845-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education Systems and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political strategy and policy influence in Australian school funding: a study of key stakeholder responses to the 2017 federal reforms

Matthew P. Sinclair
1 citations
The Australian Educational Researcher
Education Systems and Policy
8.93
article

Political strategy and policy influence in Australian school funding: a study of key stakeholder responses to the 2017 federal reforms

Matthew P. Sinclair
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract School funding is widely acknowledged in policy and research as both a means of supporting student learning and a key strategy for promoting educational equity. This article analyses how key stakeholders responded to the events surrounding the 2017 school funding reforms put forward by the Coalition federal government and passed by the Australian parliament. Drawing on Bowe et al.’s (2017) theorisation of the Context of Practice phase of policymaking, the analysis positions the reform period as a critical stage in the broader policymaking cycle of the Review of Funding for Schooling (2011). The analysis highlights the political tensions, lobbying techniques, and strategic manoeuvring that played a role in shaping the outcomes of this key phase. At the same time, the work raises broader questions about the extent to which either of the two major political parties can be relied upon to consistently represent and advocate for the interests of students in under-resourced schools. Looking ahead and drawing on Ball’s (1994) Context of Political Strategy, three insights—targeted political engagement and strategic messaging; exerting political pressure on multiple fronts; and fluid political allegiances and coalition building—are presented to begin to further support equity-minded stakeholders to more effectively influence school funding policy in the future for students and schools who require extra support.

The Australian Educational ResearcherVol. 52(4)
Curtin University (AU)
Australian Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Education Systems and Policy
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.