Matching cosmic shear analysis in harmonic and real space

ABSTRACT Recent cosmic shear analyses have exhibited discrepancies of up to $1\sigma$ between the inferred cosmological parameters when analysing summary statistics in real space versus harmonic space. In this paper, we demonstrate the consistent measurement and analysis of cosmic shear two-point functions in harmonic and real space using the imaster algorithm. This algorithm provides a unified prescription to model the survey window effects and scale cuts in both real space (due to observational systematics) and harmonic space (due to model limitations), resulting in a matching estimation of the cosmic shear power spectrum from both harmonic and real space estimators. We show that the imaster algorithm gives matching results using measurements from the HSC Y1 mock shape catalogs in both real and harmonic space, resulting in matching inferences of $S_8=\sigma _8(\Omega _m/0.3)^{0.5}$. This method provides an unbiased estimate of the cosmic shear power spectrum, and $S_8$ inference that has a correlation coefficient of 0.997 between analyses using measurements in real space and harmonic space when $S_8$ is the only free parameter. We observe the mean difference between the two inferred $S_8$ values to be 0.0004 across noise-free mock realizations, far below the observed difference of 0.042 for the published HSC Y1 analyses and well below the statistical uncertainties. While the notation employed in this paper is specific to photometric galaxy surveys, the methods are equally applicable and can be extended to spectroscopic galaxy surveys, intensity mapping, and CMB surveys.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf788
Primary Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Matching cosmic shear analysis in harmonic and real space

Andy Park, Xiangchong Li, Sukhdeep Singh, Rachel Mandelbaum et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
article

Matching cosmic shear analysis in harmonic and real space

Andy Park, Xiangchong Li, Sukhdeep Singh, Rachel Mandelbaum, Tianqing Zhang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent cosmic shear analyses have exhibited discrepancies of up to $1\sigma$ between the inferred cosmological parameters when analysing summary statistics in real space versus harmonic space. In this paper, we demonstrate the consistent measurement and analysis of cosmic shear two-point functions in harmonic and real space using the imaster algorithm. This algorithm provides a unified prescription to model the survey window effects and scale cuts in both real space (due to observational systematics) and harmonic space (due to model limitations), resulting in a matching estimation of the cosmic shear power spectrum from both harmonic and real space estimators. We show that the imaster algorithm gives matching results using measurements from the HSC Y1 mock shape catalogs in both real and harmonic space, resulting in matching inferences of $S_8=\sigma _8(\Omega _m/0.3)^{0.5}$. This method provides an unbiased estimate of the cosmic shear power spectrum, and $S_8$ inference that has a correlation coefficient of 0.997 between analyses using measurements in real space and harmonic space when $S_8$ is the only free parameter. We observe the mean difference between the two inferred $S_8$ values to be 0.0004 across noise-free mock realizations, far below the observed difference of 0.042 for the published HSC Y1 analyses and well below the statistical uncertainties. While the notation employed in this paper is specific to photometric galaxy surveys, the methods are equally applicable and can be extended to spectroscopic galaxy surveys, intensity mapping, and CMB surveys.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 540(2)
University of Pittsburgh (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Carnegie Mellon University
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Matching cosmic shear analysis in harmonic and real space — Andy Park, Xiangchong Li, et al. · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS