Beyond "Vulnerable Populations": A Unified Understanding of Vulnerability From A Socio-Ecological Perspective

HCI and CSCW research has witnessed increasing efforts to address diversity and inclusion in research and design practice, as evidenced by the growing body of research with populations deemed as vulnerable, marginalized, or underserved. However, this work has been largely limited to a population-specific approach, i.e., identifying certain populations as vulnerable and gathering their individual experiences. Drawing primarily from human-centered security and privacy research, we identify three key challenges faced by this population-specific approach: (1) It is limited in addressing user diversity within the target population; (2) It may fail to capture the complex social reality of vulnerability; and (3) It runs the risk of perpetuating othering and stereotypes. To address these limitations, we propose a socio-ecological perspective on vulnerability adapted from the Ecological System Theory (EST). We argue that a socio-ecological perspective of vulnerability can guide researchers to look beyond static and stigmatizing definitions of vulnerability --- instead, focus on the situations, relations, and structures that lead to vulnerability, eventually enabling transferable knowledge of vulnerability across populations. We demonstrate how the socio-ecological lens maps onto existing work and generates new insights in the case of older adults' security and privacy, as well as its potential for being applied to other contexts such as reproductive privacy and responsible artificial intelligence. We end by providing concrete recommendations on how HCI and CSCW research can better operationalize vulnerability in scholarship and design practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3710935
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond "Vulnerable Populations": A Unified Understanding of Vulnerability From A Socio-Ecological Perspective

Lucy Simko, Yixin Zou, Xinru Tang, Gabriel Lima et al.
2 citations
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
3.87
article

Beyond "Vulnerable Populations": A Unified Understanding of Vulnerability From A Socio-Ecological Perspective

Lucy Simko, Yixin Zou, Xinru Tang, Gabriel Lima, Li Jiang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

HCI and CSCW research has witnessed increasing efforts to address diversity and inclusion in research and design practice, as evidenced by the growing body of research with populations deemed as vulnerable, marginalized, or underserved. However, this work has been largely limited to a population-specific approach, i.e., identifying certain populations as vulnerable and gathering their individual experiences. Drawing primarily from human-centered security and privacy research, we identify three key challenges faced by this population-specific approach: (1) It is limited in addressing user diversity within the target population; (2) It may fail to capture the complex social reality of vulnerability; and (3) It runs the risk of perpetuating othering and stereotypes. To address these limitations, we propose a socio-ecological perspective on vulnerability adapted from the Ecological System Theory (EST). We argue that a socio-ecological perspective of vulnerability can guide researchers to look beyond static and stigmatizing definitions of vulnerability --- instead, focus on the situations, relations, and structures that lead to vulnerability, eventually enabling transferable knowledge of vulnerability across populations. We demonstrate how the socio-ecological lens maps onto existing work and generates new insights in the case of older adults' security and privacy, as well as its potential for being applied to other contexts such as reproductive privacy and responsible artificial intelligence. We end by providing concrete recommendations on how HCI and CSCW research can better operationalize vulnerability in scholarship and design practice.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 9(2)
George Washington University (US), University of California, Irvine (US), Max Planck Institute for Security and Privacy (DE), Barnard College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.