Comparing Bitumen’s Molecular Weight Distribution Derived from Different Methods

ABSTRACT Although molecular weight distribution (MWD) is commonly employed to characterize bitumen properties, there remains a lack of knowledge concerning the advantages and disadvantages associated with various methods for determining the distribution. The present study seeks to compare the outcomes of MWD obtained through three distinct methods. Two of these methods rely on gel permeation chromatography (GPC), whereas the third is grounded in rheological investigations. Thirteen unique samples of neat bitumen, sourced from different origins, undergo testing and analysis. The findings reveal that, although minor discrepancies are evident among the different GPC methods, the results derived from rheological investigations exhibit significant inconsistencies. Specifically, the outcomes indicate lower average molecular weight values and distinct distribution shapes in the case of rheological investigations. Further refinements are needed to match the outcomes across the different methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1520/jte20240215
Primary Topic
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Bitumen’s Molecular Weight Distribution Derived from Different Methods

Koorosh Naderi, Céline Jonas, Xavier Carbonneau, Rodrigo Shigueiro Siroma
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
article

Comparing Bitumen’s Molecular Weight Distribution Derived from Different Methods

Koorosh Naderi, Céline Jonas, Xavier Carbonneau, Rodrigo Shigueiro Siroma
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although molecular weight distribution (MWD) is commonly employed to characterize bitumen properties, there remains a lack of knowledge concerning the advantages and disadvantages associated with various methods for determining the distribution. The present study seeks to compare the outcomes of MWD obtained through three distinct methods. Two of these methods rely on gel permeation chromatography (GPC), whereas the third is grounded in rheological investigations. Thirteen unique samples of neat bitumen, sourced from different origins, undergo testing and analysis. The findings reveal that, although minor discrepancies are evident among the different GPC methods, the results derived from rheological investigations exhibit significant inconsistencies. Specifically, the outcomes indicate lower average molecular weight values and distinct distribution shapes in the case of rheological investigations. Further refinements are needed to match the outcomes across the different methods.

Journal of Testing and EvaluationVol. 53(2)
Direction de la Recherche Technologique (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.