FRESCO–2 trial and fruquintinib: A clearer picture of the control arm

Though vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-targeting drugs have been approved in the past and are known for their potential off-site action, fruquintinib is a possible new, specific inhibitor of VEGFR-1, 2, and 3. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved fruquintinib based on the FRESCO-2 trial results. However, the FRESCO-2 trial is potentially problematic given the suboptimal choice of placebo in the trial, and the poor cost-effectiveness of fruquintinib. Firstly, we argue that fruquintinib should have been tested against regorafenib, and only offered a moderate benefit despite being tested against a suboptimal placebo. Secondly, fruquintinib is likely cost ineffective (measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALY)), with a crude estimation placing its value over a million USD per QALY. Lastly, we show that the use of a suboptimal placebo is unfortunately not new.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Oncology
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102392
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FRESCO–2 trial and fruquintinib: A clearer picture of the control arm

Sruthi Ranganathan, Timothée Olivier, Vinay Prasad, Alyson Haslam
Translational Oncology
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

FRESCO–2 trial and fruquintinib: A clearer picture of the control arm

Sruthi Ranganathan, Timothée Olivier, Vinay Prasad, Alyson Haslam
article en

Abstract

Though vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-targeting drugs have been approved in the past and are known for their potential off-site action, fruquintinib is a possible new, specific inhibitor of VEGFR-1, 2, and 3. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved fruquintinib based on the FRESCO-2 trial results. However, the FRESCO-2 trial is potentially problematic given the suboptimal choice of placebo in the trial, and the poor cost-effectiveness of fruquintinib. Firstly, we argue that fruquintinib should have been tested against regorafenib, and only offered a moderate benefit despite being tested against a suboptimal placebo. Secondly, fruquintinib is likely cost ineffective (measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALY)), with a crude estimation placing its value over a million USD per QALY. Lastly, we show that the use of a suboptimal placebo is unfortunately not new.

Translational OncologyVol. 58
University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Cambridge (GB), University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.