Navigating the Transition to Remote Online Examinations in Undergraduate Medical Education in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Student Satisfaction and Perception Analysis

Background Remote online assessment (ROA) systems gained prominence in undergraduate medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study describes a uniquely phased implementation of an ROA system in a resource-limited setting, guided by an analysis of student satisfaction and perceptions. Methodology This observational study presents data from the implementation of ROAs at a private medical school in Lahore, Pakistan. Four principal activities were conducted on five undergraduate medical and four dental program classes, including two mock and two summative assessments. The ROA system utilized open-source, web-based software to administer the assessments. Primary outcomes included the rate of uninterrupted exam completions and student satisfaction (measured on a five-point Likert scale) during the first three activities. Secondary outcomes examined perceptions of educational impact, perceived usefulness, and the effectiveness of anti-cheating measures. Results Over 800 students participated in the ROA implementation process. Clinical-year students reported significantly higher levels of satisfaction compared to preclinical students (mean ranks = 443.18 vs. 372.81, 454.31 vs. 409, and 435.50 vs. 380.13, p < 0.05), while female students consistently reported lower satisfaction. One-on-one online training sessions conducted in small groups and mini-mock exams significantly improved overall satisfaction (p < 0.005). Key challenges included insufficient exam time (n = 614, 73.9%) and internet connectivity issues (n = 470, 57%). Although live proctoring effectively deterred cheating, it also heightened exam-related anxiety (n = 313, 77.9%). Despite perceiving ROAs as inferior to traditional examinations, students acknowledged their value in supporting course completion and preparation for summative assessments. Conclusions A phased, adaptive approach is essential for implementing ROAs in resource-limited settings. Repeated mock exams, small-group training, and targeted support for preclinical and female students can improve satisfaction and program outcomes. Addressing technical and psychological barriers is critical to successfully integrating online assessments into undergraduate medical education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.84480
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the Transition to Remote Online Examinations in Undergraduate Medical Education in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Student Satisfaction and Perception Analysis

Hosseinpoor Saeed, Minahil Fatima Chaudhry, Sana Ali, Noor Fatima Ahsen et al.
1 citations
Cureus
Innovations in Medical Education
1.88
article

Navigating the Transition to Remote Online Examinations in Undergraduate Medical Education in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Student Satisfaction and Perception Analysis

Hosseinpoor Saeed, Minahil Fatima Chaudhry, Sana Ali, Noor Fatima Ahsen, Javed Khalil, Syed Muhammad Hammad Ali
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Remote online assessment (ROA) systems gained prominence in undergraduate medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study describes a uniquely phased implementation of an ROA system in a resource-limited setting, guided by an analysis of student satisfaction and perceptions. Methodology This observational study presents data from the implementation of ROAs at a private medical school in Lahore, Pakistan. Four principal activities were conducted on five undergraduate medical and four dental program classes, including two mock and two summative assessments. The ROA system utilized open-source, web-based software to administer the assessments. Primary outcomes included the rate of uninterrupted exam completions and student satisfaction (measured on a five-point Likert scale) during the first three activities. Secondary outcomes examined perceptions of educational impact, perceived usefulness, and the effectiveness of anti-cheating measures. Results Over 800 students participated in the ROA implementation process. Clinical-year students reported significantly higher levels of satisfaction compared to preclinical students (mean ranks = 443.18 vs. 372.81, 454.31 vs. 409, and 435.50 vs. 380.13, p < 0.05), while female students consistently reported lower satisfaction. One-on-one online training sessions conducted in small groups and mini-mock exams significantly improved overall satisfaction (p < 0.005). Key challenges included insufficient exam time (n = 614, 73.9%) and internet connectivity issues (n = 470, 57%). Although live proctoring effectively deterred cheating, it also heightened exam-related anxiety (n = 313, 77.9%). Despite perceiving ROAs as inferior to traditional examinations, students acknowledged their value in supporting course completion and preparation for summative assessments. Conclusions A phased, adaptive approach is essential for implementing ROAs in resource-limited settings. Repeated mock exams, small-group training, and targeted support for preclinical and female students can improve satisfaction and program outcomes. Addressing technical and psychological barriers is critical to successfully integrating online assessments into undergraduate medical education.

CureusVol. 17(5)
Joslin Diabetes Center (US), University of Lancashire (GB), Allama Iqbal Medical College (PK), James Cook University Hospital (GB), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), Memorial Hospital (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Innovations in Medical Education
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.