Abundances and characteristics of small (< 0.3 mm) and large (0.3–5 mm) microplastics found in Aotearoa New Zealand beach sediments

Microplastic contamination has been widely documented across the globe, however few reports have been published on this topic in Aotearoa New Zealand. In this study, microplastic contamination was assessed in beach sediments from 23 sites across three regions of the country: Northland, Waikato and Canterbury. A protocol was devised and validated to separately isolate, quantify and characterise microplastics in two size ranges: large (300-5000 μm) and small (< 300 μm) particles. The size distributions at all sites were strongly skewed towards small microplastics, which represented >99 % of the total particle count. Overall mean abundances were 3.3 particles kg<sup>-1</sup> (range 0-27) and 788 particles kg<sup>-1</sup> (range 0-9818) for large and small microplastics, respectively. No significant differences in concentrations of either size category were observed between the three regions or when comparing west coast with east coast sites. The particles were also characterised with respect to morphology, colour and chemical composition. Fibres (42 %) and fragments (39 %) were the most common morphologies. The most abundant polymer types were polyethylene (46 %) and polyamide (33 %), although substantial variations in microplastic composition with both size category and location were found. These findings underline the importance of employing sampling and isolation techniques for microplastics from environmental samples that ensure the collection and quantification of smaller sized particles, which are easily missed. Failure to follow adequate protocols will result in severe risk of underestimating the actual extent of microplastic contamination and its potential environmental impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118144
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abundances and characteristics of small (< 0.3 mm) and large (0.3–5 mm) microplastics found in Aotearoa New Zealand beach sediments

Kate Parker, Helena Ruffell, Olga Pantos, Robert Abbel et al.
2 citations
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
1.01
article

Abundances and characteristics of small (< 0.3 mm) and large (0.3–5 mm) microplastics found in Aotearoa New Zealand beach sediments

Kate Parker, Helena Ruffell, Olga Pantos, Robert Abbel, Hayden Masterton, James H. Bridson, Queenie Tanjay, Anna de Lena
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Microplastic contamination has been widely documented across the globe, however few reports have been published on this topic in Aotearoa New Zealand. In this study, microplastic contamination was assessed in beach sediments from 23 sites across three regions of the country: Northland, Waikato and Canterbury. A protocol was devised and validated to separately isolate, quantify and characterise microplastics in two size ranges: large (300-5000 μm) and small (< 300 μm) particles. The size distributions at all sites were strongly skewed towards small microplastics, which represented >99 % of the total particle count. Overall mean abundances were 3.3 particles kg<sup>-1</sup> (range 0-27) and 788 particles kg<sup>-1</sup> (range 0-9818) for large and small microplastics, respectively. No significant differences in concentrations of either size category were observed between the three regions or when comparing west coast with east coast sites. The particles were also characterised with respect to morphology, colour and chemical composition. Fibres (42 %) and fragments (39 %) were the most common morphologies. The most abundant polymer types were polyethylene (46 %) and polyamide (33 %), although substantial variations in microplastic composition with both size category and location were found. These findings underline the importance of employing sampling and isolation techniques for microplastics from environmental samples that ensure the collection and quantification of smaller sized particles, which are easily missed. Failure to follow adequate protocols will result in severe risk of underestimating the actual extent of microplastic contamination and its potential environmental impact.

Marine Pollution BulletinVol. 218
Scion (NZ), New Zealand Institute for Public Health and Forensic Science (NZ)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.