Incremental Detection of Denial Constraint Violations

Denial constraints (DCs) are well-known to express business rules on data. They subsume other integrity constraints (ICs), such as key constraints or functional dependencies. One can use traditional DBMS or specialized algorithms to validate such dependencies on a dataset. However, no known approach exists to detect DC violations incrementally. Data typically changes over time, and recomputing the entire violation set after every update is wasteful. Alerting data practitioners of data quality issues immediately, enables them to take measures earlier and can help prevent follow-up issues. We present Weever, the first incremental approach to detect all violations of a given set of DCs. It uses a novel index structure to process inequality predicates and a new method to plan the execution order of predicates depending on their selectivity, reducing redundant computations when handling multiple DCs. Our evaluation shows that Weever outperforms a DBMS-based baseline by up to two orders of magnitude. And in the same time that a state-of-the-art static approach takes to analyze an entire dataset, Weever processes up to 200 000 insertions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14778/3717755.3717761
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Database Systems and Queries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incremental Detection of Denial Constraint Violations

Youri Kaminsky, Felix Naumann, Eduardo H. M. Pena
1 citations
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
Advanced Database Systems and Queries
0.35
article

Incremental Detection of Denial Constraint Violations

Youri Kaminsky, Felix Naumann, Eduardo H. M. Pena
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Denial constraints (DCs) are well-known to express business rules on data. They subsume other integrity constraints (ICs), such as key constraints or functional dependencies. One can use traditional DBMS or specialized algorithms to validate such dependencies on a dataset. However, no known approach exists to detect DC violations incrementally. Data typically changes over time, and recomputing the entire violation set after every update is wasteful. Alerting data practitioners of data quality issues immediately, enables them to take measures earlier and can help prevent follow-up issues. We present Weever, the first incremental approach to detect all violations of a given set of DCs. It uses a novel index structure to process inequality predicates and a new method to plan the execution order of predicates depending on their selectivity, reducing redundant computations when handling multiple DCs. Our evaluation shows that Weever outperforms a DBMS-based baseline by up to two orders of magnitude. And in the same time that a state-of-the-art static approach takes to analyze an entire dataset, Weever processes up to 200 000 insertions.

Proceedings of the VLDB EndowmentVol. 18(4)
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR), Hasso Plattner Institute (DE), University of Potsdam (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Advanced Database Systems and Queries
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Incremental Detection of Denial Constraint Violations — Youri Kaminsky, Felix Naumann, et al. · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS