Enhancing UAV Traffic Awareness: A Human-in-the-Loop Evaluation of a Camera-View-Based Traffic Display

The increased use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has raised concerns about potential conflicts with manned aviation. In recent years, several mid-air collisions between UAVs and general aviation aircraft have occurred. This issue is particularly relevant for beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) operations, where the UAV pilot cannot visually monitor the surrounding airspace. BVLOS operations in low-level airspace are planned for several commercial UAV applications and require solutions to avoid conflicts with manned aviation. Studies have evaluated the use of traffic displays for larger UAVs, mainly in a military context, which operate in higher controlled airspace. However, no study has been conducted for low-level UAV missions with smaller civil UAVs. This work first shows a newly developed integrated traffic display design based on the transmitted camera-view of the UAV, which provides conflict information and avoidance maneuver guidance. This design is then compared to a baseline and an external 2D traffic display in a human-in-the-loop evaluation. The baseline condition provides a camera view of the UAV along with a moving map but no traffic information (representing current practices). The external 2D traffic display is shown on a second monitor that provides similar traffic information as the integrated camera-view traffic display. During the evaluation, participants are tasked to control a fixed-wing UAV on two UAV BVLOS mission types (surveillance and inspection) that involve encountering traffic. In some cases, an avoidance maneuver is required to avoid conflicts. The results indicate that the number of separation losses is significantly higher when using the baseline display as opposed to using either traffic display. In the baseline condition, some losses of separation resulted in near mid-air collisions (NMAC) with other traffic, indicating insufficient traffic awareness to safely conduct BVLOS flight missions. In contrast, no NMAC occurred with either traffic display. Subjectively, participants rated the integrated camera-view display best. The study’s insights demonstrate the need to provide UAV pilots with real-time traffic information. Integrating this information into the camera-view could be a potential solution for safely integrating UAVs into the current airspace system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation research procedia
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2025.05.015
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing UAV Traffic Awareness: A Human-in-the-Loop Evaluation of a Camera-View-Based Traffic Display

Markus Peukert
1 citations
Transportation research procedia
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
article

Enhancing UAV Traffic Awareness: A Human-in-the-Loop Evaluation of a Camera-View-Based Traffic Display

Markus Peukert
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The increased use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has raised concerns about potential conflicts with manned aviation. In recent years, several mid-air collisions between UAVs and general aviation aircraft have occurred. This issue is particularly relevant for beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) operations, where the UAV pilot cannot visually monitor the surrounding airspace. BVLOS operations in low-level airspace are planned for several commercial UAV applications and require solutions to avoid conflicts with manned aviation. Studies have evaluated the use of traffic displays for larger UAVs, mainly in a military context, which operate in higher controlled airspace. However, no study has been conducted for low-level UAV missions with smaller civil UAVs. This work first shows a newly developed integrated traffic display design based on the transmitted camera-view of the UAV, which provides conflict information and avoidance maneuver guidance. This design is then compared to a baseline and an external 2D traffic display in a human-in-the-loop evaluation. The baseline condition provides a camera view of the UAV along with a moving map but no traffic information (representing current practices). The external 2D traffic display is shown on a second monitor that provides similar traffic information as the integrated camera-view traffic display. During the evaluation, participants are tasked to control a fixed-wing UAV on two UAV BVLOS mission types (surveillance and inspection) that involve encountering traffic. In some cases, an avoidance maneuver is required to avoid conflicts. The results indicate that the number of separation losses is significantly higher when using the baseline display as opposed to using either traffic display. In the baseline condition, some losses of separation resulted in near mid-air collisions (NMAC) with other traffic, indicating insufficient traffic awareness to safely conduct BVLOS flight missions. In contrast, no NMAC occurred with either traffic display. Subjectively, participants rated the integrated camera-view display best. The study’s insights demonstrate the need to provide UAV pilots with real-time traffic information. Integrating this information into the camera-view could be a potential solution for safely integrating UAVs into the current airspace system.

Transportation research procediaVol. 88
Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.