Performance Comparison of Spatial Data Indexing Using Distributed Systems

In this study, the efficiency and scalability of Geomesa and Mosaic, two well-known platforms for spatial data indexing and join operations in distributed environments, are investigated using Apache Spark and Scala/Python. The experiments investigated the impact of varying the input sizes, index utilization, and multi-node environments. Geomesa exhibits commendable performance, particularly without geohash indexing incorporation, demonstrating its efficiency in handling large-scale spatiotemporal datasets, as Geomesa requires 10.6% less time than Mosaic. By contrast, Mosaic employing the H3 indexing methodology consistently outperformed Geomesa, achieving 16.6% less time. These findings underscore the pivotal role of spatial indexing, with H3 indexing emerging as a superior technique in join operations. This research provides valuable insights into the comparative strengths and efficiencies of Geomesa and Mosaic, providing practitioners with informed perspectives for spatial data processing applications in distributed systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ictcs65341.2025.10989398
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Data Management and Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Comparison of Spatial Data Indexing Using Distributed Systems

Amer Al-Badarneh, Amro Saleh, Hatem Mosa
1 citations
Data Management and Algorithms
1.49
article

Performance Comparison of Spatial Data Indexing Using Distributed Systems

Amer Al-Badarneh, Amro Saleh, Hatem Mosa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this study, the efficiency and scalability of Geomesa and Mosaic, two well-known platforms for spatial data indexing and join operations in distributed environments, are investigated using Apache Spark and Scala/Python. The experiments investigated the impact of varying the input sizes, index utilization, and multi-node environments. Geomesa exhibits commendable performance, particularly without geohash indexing incorporation, demonstrating its efficiency in handling large-scale spatiotemporal datasets, as Geomesa requires 10.6% less time than Mosaic. By contrast, Mosaic employing the H3 indexing methodology consistently outperformed Geomesa, achieving 16.6% less time. These findings underscore the pivotal role of spatial indexing, with H3 indexing emerging as a superior technique in join operations. This research provides valuable insights into the comparative strengths and efficiencies of Geomesa and Mosaic, providing practitioners with informed perspectives for spatial data processing applications in distributed systems.

Princess Sumaya University for Technology (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Data Management and Algorithms
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.