Consultation as a shared, ethical practice: judgement ability in special needs educators’ consultation practice

The ability to make wise judgements is critical in today's school as new public management (NPM) has had a strong influence on the public sector in recent decades. Judgement ability is necessary in all professions and this article turns to judgement ability in consultation, as described in interviews with eight special needs educators (SNE). Specifically, the purpose is to contribute to knowledge of consultation in special needs education by illustrating the use of different knowledge types together with the ethics in Aristotle's concept phronesis, focusing on situational judgement in SNEs' consultation. Theoretically, the article draws on different knowledge categories in combination with the ethics in phronesis. The results picture judgement ability as a multifaceted ability, with ethics as a prominent element as there is strong concern for the teachers in the SNEs' consultation. Consultation appears as a shared, ethical practice. NPM is absent in the results, which may depend on the focus on ethics. Implications for practice for schools and for education of teachers and SNEs are to recognise and discuss ethics in combination with practical and theoretical knowledge in teaching professions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Special Needs Education
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2025.2508039
Primary Topic
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consultation as a shared, ethical practice: judgement ability in special needs educators’ consultation practice

Susanne Hansson
European Journal of Special Needs Education
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
article

Consultation as a shared, ethical practice: judgement ability in special needs educators’ consultation practice

Susanne Hansson
article en

Abstract

The ability to make wise judgements is critical in today's school as new public management (NPM) has had a strong influence on the public sector in recent decades. Judgement ability is necessary in all professions and this article turns to judgement ability in consultation, as described in interviews with eight special needs educators (SNE). Specifically, the purpose is to contribute to knowledge of consultation in special needs education by illustrating the use of different knowledge types together with the ethics in Aristotle's concept phronesis, focusing on situational judgement in SNEs' consultation. Theoretically, the article draws on different knowledge categories in combination with the ethics in phronesis. The results picture judgement ability as a multifaceted ability, with ethics as a prominent element as there is strong concern for the teachers in the SNEs' consultation. Consultation appears as a shared, ethical practice. NPM is absent in the results, which may depend on the focus on ethics. Implications for practice for schools and for education of teachers and SNEs are to recognise and discuss ethics in combination with practical and theoretical knowledge in teaching professions.

European Journal of Special Needs EducationVol. 41(1)
Karlstad University (SE)
Karlstads universitet, Høgskolen i Innlandet
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.