Balancing Precision and Speed: Introducing the Performance Efficiency Evaluation Ratio (PEER) in Visual Odometry

Visual odometry is extensively utilized in robotics, autonomous navigation, and augmented reality to estimate motion by analyzing sequential images. Provides high precision without relying on external sensors such as GPS. However, real-time visual odometry systems must strike a balance between computational correctness and speed, a critical yet often overlooked trade-off in existing evaluation methods. Traditional metrics such as ATE, RPE, RMSE, FPS, and RTF typically assess precision or efficiency in isolation and lack adaptability to real-time constraints. To address this limitation, we propose the Performance Efficiency Evaluation Ratio (PEER), a novel, adaptive, and lightweight metric that jointly evaluates algorithm performance based on both fidelity and computation time. PEER incorporates a tunable weighting parameter to prioritize performance, speed, or a balanced trade-off, and employs normalization techniques to ensure comparability across different algorithms and systems. We evaluated PEER using the KITTI dataset with various feature extraction algorithms (SIFT, ORB, BRISK, KAZE, AKAZE) and matching algorithms (BF, FLANN). The findings indicate that PEER not only distinguishes performance effectively across various scenarios but also shows strong alignment with established MCDM methods such as TOPSIS and VIKOR, all while maintaining lower computational complexity and greater suitability for real-time deployment. Overall, PEER provides a robust and flexible framework for optimizing visual odometry systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3571921
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing Precision and Speed: Introducing the Performance Efficiency Evaluation Ratio (PEER) in Visual Odometry

Cem Atılgan, Muharrem Mercımek
IEEE Access
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Balancing Precision and Speed: Introducing the Performance Efficiency Evaluation Ratio (PEER) in Visual Odometry

Cem Atılgan, Muharrem Mercımek
article en

Abstract

Visual odometry is extensively utilized in robotics, autonomous navigation, and augmented reality to estimate motion by analyzing sequential images. Provides high precision without relying on external sensors such as GPS. However, real-time visual odometry systems must strike a balance between computational correctness and speed, a critical yet often overlooked trade-off in existing evaluation methods. Traditional metrics such as ATE, RPE, RMSE, FPS, and RTF typically assess precision or efficiency in isolation and lack adaptability to real-time constraints. To address this limitation, we propose the Performance Efficiency Evaluation Ratio (PEER), a novel, adaptive, and lightweight metric that jointly evaluates algorithm performance based on both fidelity and computation time. PEER incorporates a tunable weighting parameter to prioritize performance, speed, or a balanced trade-off, and employs normalization techniques to ensure comparability across different algorithms and systems. We evaluated PEER using the KITTI dataset with various feature extraction algorithms (SIFT, ORB, BRISK, KAZE, AKAZE) and matching algorithms (BF, FLANN). The findings indicate that PEER not only distinguishes performance effectively across various scenarios but also shows strong alignment with established MCDM methods such as TOPSIS and VIKOR, all while maintaining lower computational complexity and greater suitability for real-time deployment. Overall, PEER provides a robust and flexible framework for optimizing visual odometry systems.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Kırklareli University (TR), Yıldız Technical University (TR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.